+380952312525
Law Firm

Transport-Shipping-International Trade-Corporate and Taxes - Yachting

Sign up for a consultation

Interlegal Shipping digest Q4 2022

9 December, 2022

5

Interlegal Quarterly Shipping Newsletter

BIMCO PUBLISHES UPDATED GENCON-2022 CONTRACT?

In order to reflect the commercial and legal requirements in today’s shipping practices, on 25 October BIMCO has updated and presented the most widely used voyage charter party in the dry bulk sector on a worldwide basis – GENCON.

GENCON las updated in 1994 and being one of BIMCO flagship charter parties it must reflect the challenges of the modern shipping industry.

The GENCON 22 version aims to strike the right balance with?regards to the rights and obligations of both parties in a charter party. For that purpose, BIMCO has amended several key clauses and made the charter party standard more comprehensive. Furthermore, the new version attempts to fill the gaps of interpretation that leaves a little room for disputes through clear wording and structure.

The Owners Responsibility Clause (Clause 2) is one of the key clauses that has been amended. In the previous 1994 version, this clause was criticized for dissatisfactory allocation of risk between the ship owner and the charterer. This clause granted owners broad protection for loss, damage, or delay to the cargo, even in case of negligence on part of the crew. Meanwhile, the clause provided less security for the owners in terms of other events, accidents, and financial loss, therefore it had to apply the Paramount Clause for detail regulation. BIMCO’s view is that such replacements failed to provide a balanced solution, therefore the new clause entitles the owners to rely on the rights, defences, immunities, and limitations of liability available under the Hague-Visby Rules. Furthermore, the clause place duties on the ship owner to exercise due diligence to provide a seaworthy ship and properly care for the cargo. The applicability of the seaworthiness obligation was set between the loading of the cargo and the commencement of the laden voyage.

Besides above, BIMCO has also added a new clause 3 regulating the risk and liability of damage to the cargo during loading, stowage, carriage and discharge.

The GENCON 22 continues to place the responsibility for the cost and risk of cargo operations on the charterer. While the responsibility for delays is split between the parties, in that the owners bear the risk for delays by navigation risks within their control and charterer for commercial risks. Moreover, the new version continues to protect owners against liability for cargo loss or damage but is remedying the charterers risk by placing fundamental duties on the owners before commencement and under the voyage through clauses 2 and 3.

GENCON 22 significantly differs from its predecessors, which sought mainly to clarify and update the charter party standard. The new version is presented by BIMCO as a whole new charter party which aims to reduce the initial costs for both sides of entering into a charter party through reducing needed adjustments. At the moment it remains unknown how long will it take for adaption to the new version on the market, however we are sure that it will catch on in the long run.

Misdelivery by the carrier after discharge and the Article III Rule 6 time bar: the ‘Alhani gap’ is filled

FIMBank p.l.c. v KCH Shipping Co., Ltd [2022] EWHC 2400 (Comm)

The Commercial Court (Sir William Blair) has handed down judgment in FIMBank p.l.c. v KCH Shipping Co., Ltd, an appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996, holding that the time bar in Article III rule 6 of the Hague-Visby Rules can apply to claims in relation to misdelivery after discharge, that resolves an important question which had not previously been decided by the English courts.

Background

The claim was brought by FIMBank p.l.c. (“FIMBank”), as the holder of bills of lading, for the alleged misdelivery of cargo by the contractual carrier, KCH Shipping Co., Ltd (“KCH”). The bills were concluded on the Congenbill form, and were subject to the Hague-Visby Rules, including the time bar in Article III r 6 of one year after delivery which applies to claims against carriers.

FIMBank served a Notice of Arbitration on KCH after that time bar expired. The Claimants’ position was that its claim was nevertheless not caught by the time bar. The following arguments were provided:

(a) on the facts, delivery took place after discharge; and

(b) as a matter of law, the time bar did not apply to claims for misdelivery occurring after discharge.

In claim submissions it was also stated that the Hague-Visby Rules do not regulate a carrier’s obligation to deliver cargo (as opposed to the carriage of goods by sea), and only relate to a ‘period of responsibility’ which ends with the discharge of cargo. The Claimants also referred to Clause 2(c) of the Congenbill: “The Carrier shall in no case be responsible for loss and damage to the cargo, howsoever arising prior to loading into and after discharge from the Vessel …”. Basing on it they further argued that the parties had, in any event, contractually disapplied the Rules in respect of the period after discharge.

As a result, the arbitral tribunal determined that FIMBank’s claim was time-barred irrespective of whether delivery post-dated discharge on the facts. The Award mentioned the following:

  1. the Hague-Visby Rules time bar can apply to claims relating to misdelivery occurring after discharge; and
  2. (ii) Clause 2(c) of the Congenbill form does not disapply the Rules in respect of the period after discharge.

The Court’s reasoning

Soon there was an appeal on above issues, however it was dismissed by the Court, which upheld the tribunal’s decision on both questions.

On the first issue, the Court concluded that, on its true construction, Article III r 6 of the Hague-Visby Rules applies to claims for misdelivery of cargo after discharge. And even if such conclusion was wrong, the tribunal’s decision was in any event justified by its finding that the bills of lading contained an implied term providing that the Hague-Visby Rules obligations and immunities are to continue after actual discharge and until delivery takes place, in line with the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in The MSC Amsterdam [2007] EWCA Civ 794.

On the second issue, the Court held that, on a proper construction, Clause 2(c) did not disapply the Hague-Visby Rules to the period after discharge. Although the Claimants relied in this regard on The MSC Amsterdam, in which the express terms of the bill of lading concerned were held to have disapplied the Hague Rules after discharge, the Judge held that that decision did not warrant a different result, insofar as it featured a bill of lading with materially distinguishable terms.

BIMCO publishes Electronic Bill of Lading Standard for Bulk Shipping

Issuing bills of lading electronically has been possible for more than 20 years. However, less than 2% of world trade is carried on electronic bills of lading. This is partly due to lack of open standards and interoperability, i.e. lack of possibility to transfer an eBL from one approved platform to another. This is a particular issue for trade finance banks wanting to transition from paper bills to eBLs. Aiming to help increase adoption of digital trade documents in shipping, BIMCO has published an electronic bill of lading standard.

The BIMCO electronic bill of lading standard is a structured dataset consisting of 20 predefined data fields that are common to bulk shipping bills of lading. Its design is consistent with bills of lading used in the bulk sector, for example, CONGENBILL. This means that the underlying framework applies equally to BIMCO’s various bills of lading and other bulk bills of lading, for example house bills. The standard is freely available to any electronic bill of lading solution provider.

Needless to say, that BIMCO’s eBL Standard is aligned with the UN/CEFACT Multimodal Transport Reference Data Model as well as the standards produced by FIT Alliance members. The members of the FIT Alliance are: BIMCO, DCSA, FIATA, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and SWIFT.

BIMCO Advice about holiday legislation

A recent dispute about laytime in a Ukrainian port was dropped as soon as BIMCO’s advice about holiday legislation and labour laws was received.

Background

Ukraine has imposed martial law and the articles in the Labour code governing holidays have been suspended as a result. This is what led to the disagreement between the owner and the charterer.

In Ukraine, in common with countries such as the UK and the US, if a holiday falls on a Sunday, then special working arrangements are applied or transferred to the following day (Monday) to compensate workers for the fact that the holiday coincided with a day they would not anyway have worked.

In this particular case, the holiday was 1 May, which fell on a Sunday meaning that special working arrangements would be applied to Monday 2 May.

  • The charterers therefore considered that laytime would not run on that day. They said that as 1 May was a Sunday, the holiday normally held that day was instead held on 2 May.
  • The owners disagreed and pointed to the Ukrainian martial law which had suspended holidays. The owners thus felt that 2 May was not a holiday and that laytime would run on that day.

Conclusion

BIMCO advised that because of martial law suspending the law on holidays in the labour law of Ukraine, the owners were correct to argue that 2 May was not a holiday – and that even 1 May could arguably not be considered a holiday under BIMCO’s definition.

“We are happy to inform you that Charterers have accepted BIMCO’s comments and paid demurrage in full in line with Owners’ laytime calculation.”

War and warlike operations in a time of uncertainty

The outbreak of war can have serious consequences on charterparties of all kinds, therefore it is extremely important for industry to develop several standard clauses to clarify the parties’ obligations in such uncertain times.

CONWARTIME 2013

The most commonly used war clauses in the market are BIMCO’s “war risks clause for time chartering 2013” (“CONWARTIME 2013”) and the “war risks clause for voyage chartering 2013” (“VOYWAR 2013”).  The definition of war risks is identical under the clauses:

“War Risks” shall include any actual, threatened or reported:

War, act of war, civil war or hostilities; revolution;

rebellion; civil commotion; warlike operations; laying of mines; acts of piracy and/or violent robbery and/or capture/seizure (…) acts of terrorists; acts of hostility or malicious damage; blockades (whether imposed against all vessels or imposed selectively against ­vessels of certain flags or ownership, or against certain cargoes or crews or otherwise howsoever), by any person, body, ­terrorist or political group, or the government of any state or territory whether ­recognised or not, which, in the reasonable judgement of the Master and/or the Owners, may be dangerous or may become ­dangerous to the Vessel, cargo, crew or other ­persons on board the Vessel.”

War risks include acts of hostility or malicious damage by “bod[ies]”, including “terrorist” and “political” groups. This would have included the irregular and often unidentified military personnel which took part in, for instance, the annexation of Crimea, and would include the authorities of the disputed regions of Ukraine under Russian occupation, such as Crimea.

VOYWAR 2013

The BIMCO explanatory notes clearly interprets the primary differences between the forms:

“In contrast to CONWARTIME, where a war risk may exist before or after a charter party has been concluded, VOYWAR focuses on the position before loading or after the voyage has commenced.”

This reflects the difference between a time and a voyage charter. In particular, sub-clause (b) of VOYWAR 2013 allows owners to cancel the charter before loading has commenced, if owners or the master are satisfied that the performance of the contract will expose the vessel to war risks, in their reasonable judgement.

This grants owners flexibility to react to changing events.

The situation is changing once cargo has been loaded, because at that point owners become bailees of the cargo and cargo interests become entitled to a bill of lading for the cargo under Article III Rule 3 of the Hague and Hague-Visby Rules. This is then covered by sub-clause (c) of the VOYWAR 2013 form.

Both VOYWAR 2013 and CONWARTIME 2013 rely on the “reasonable judgement” of the owners or the master in deciding whether the vessel, cargo, crew or others on board “may be” exposed to war risks. This highlights the difference between CONWARTIME 2013 and the previous CONWARTIME 1993 clause, as the former was amended requiring a “real likelihood” of danger. BIMCO’s explanatory notes to the CONWARTIME 2013 form comment as follows.

“In order to remove potential uncertainty, the test for determining whether to proceed has been amended and is now based on whether an area is dangerous. The level of danger is likely to be high but a stated reference point removes the need for complex analysis of degree of risk and whether or not it is more or less likely to occur.”

Therefore, it should be taken a significant care when the old CONWARTIME 1993 clause applies. In that case, the Triton Lark test will continue to require a “real likelihood” of danger.

Above mentioned underlines the bargain struck in the CONWARTIME 2013 clause: before the vessel has proceeded into the area, the test defers to the reasonable judgement of ­owners and the master. Once the vessel is already there, the clause does not mention the reasonable judgement test, but simply asks whether the area is dangerous or “may become dangerous”.

Key factors in assessing danger

The factors which will be relevant to owners and/or the master will depend on the circumstances of the individual case and cannot be definitively listed. However, the following factors should ordinarily be taken into account include:

  1. The JWC (Joint War Committee) listed areas, which are areas where owners are required to notify underwriters of voyages. For instance, Ukrainian and Russian waters in the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov were included in the listed areas from 00:00 hours GMT 28 February 2022 during a period of rising tensions, and before the invasion of Ukraine proper began.
  2. News reports, in particular involving attacks on marine traffic.
  3. P&I club circulars and other warnings.
  4. Input from maritime security agencies.

Conclusion

It is obvious, that the current invasion of Ukraine amounts to war or warlike operations sufficient to trigger the standard war risks clauses.

However, these rules remain open to be tested in the context of more asymmetric warfare in the future, such as in the initial stages of the invasion of Crimea. In the light of above cases, we expect the wording of these clauses to be tested by the Courts and as a result to be updated and adapted if necessary.

Latest UK sanctions against Russia

On 21 July 2022, the UK’s recent sanctions against Russia came into force. Whilst broadly looking to align themselves with existing EU sanctions, there are notable differences between how these UK sanctions will be applied which are now discussed within this update.

Amongst other things, UK introduced a prohibition on the import, acquisition and supply or delivery of Russian oil and oil products into the UK, and the provision of technical, financial and brokering assistance relating to such products destined for the UK. Such oil ban comes into force on 31 December 2022.

The restriction on providing financial services to oil and oil products has implications even for the UK’s insurance sector. From 31 December 2022, UK insurers will be prohibited from providing insurance services in respect of the import, acquisition and supply or delivery of the listed oil and oil products that originate in Russia or are located in Russia, that are destined for the UK.

However, there are some limited exceptions to the oil ban, including if the oil and oil products are cumulatively:

  1. non-Russian origin;
  2. not owned by a person connected with Russia; and
  3. only being loaded in, departing from or transiting through Russia.
Author
Aleksey Remeslo
Partner, Head of International Trade dept
Consultation
Щоб постійно отримувати важливу інформацію, а головне швидко - підписуйтеся на новини з сайту
Підпишіться на новини

Публікації з цієї категорії

Цей запис не має тегів.

Інші публікації

How Interlegal helped the largest trader from Kazakhstan

2 December, 2024

0.005k

New Transfer Pricing Rules in Cyprus: Global Transparency and New Challenges

13 November, 2024

0.012k

Post-Event Release for the Seminar “Maritime Disputes in Ukraine: Court and Arbitration Perspectives”

29 October, 2024

0.013k

Legal support for agricultural traders: an interview with a partner of a law firm

28 October, 2024

0.076k

Battle in the Black Sea

27 August, 2024

0.027k

The Hamburg case: Why the Antitrust Committee of Ukraine got concerned in the German port

24 August, 2024

0.024k

Lien on cargo on board the vessel in Ukraine

3 August, 2024

0.036k

Default by English law in commercial contract

2 August, 2024

0.019k

Updated ship arrest procedure: new opinion on ship arrest in Odesa Region in the wartime

25 July, 2024

0.01k

Investment insurance

1 July, 2024

0.006k

Interlegal Shipping digest Q4 2023

8 January, 2024

0.009k

What errors should be avoided while entering into CIF contracts?

15 December, 2023

0.017k

Certificate is final as to quality…

13 December, 2023

0.005k

18 months of war in Ukraine: how the shipping industry is faring

5 December, 2023

0.005k

Vessel blocking at the Ukrainian sea ports

4 December, 2023

0.009k

Disputes upon small demurrage: to apply to arbitration or not?

31 October, 2023

0.004k

Rising to the challenges of war

20 October, 2023

0.005k

Have you already fixed business processes of your company in Poland?

3 October, 2023

0.003k

Interpreting a Force Majeure clause in the face of international sanctions – the case of Mur Shipping BV v RTI Ltd provides guidance

16 August, 2023

0.001k

Business collaborations and partnership agreements in the wartime

3 August, 2023

0.004k

New report of Paris MOU for 2022

5 July, 2023

0.004k

What to do if the vessel arrives at destination port and freight is still unpaid?

4 July, 2023

0.007k

Is the law governing of your arbitration agreement clear?

31 May, 2023

0.006k

A million-cost inattentiveness

25 May, 2023

0.003k

Price discount as per GAFTA 48 Extension Clause

15 May, 2023

0.011k

Interlegal Shipping digest Q1 2023

24 April, 2023

0.009k

Anticipatory breach: FAQ

17 April, 2023

0.003k

Solutions for chartering business in Montenegro

27 March, 2023

0.007k

Cargo loss – warehouse director’s liability

23 March, 2023

0.005k

Bank Compliance: not so black as it is painted

6 March, 2023

0.005k

Agency Agreement: what are the keystones?

24 February, 2023

0.004k

It is your choice: Bill Of Lading or Sea Way Bill

23 February, 2023

0.006k

Overview of Schemes Implemented to Attract Business Relocation to Cyprus

13 February, 2023

0.004k

Beijing Convention on the Judicial Sale of Ships

3 February, 2023

0.007k

What should you do if your foreign counteragent fails to fulfill its obligations as per deal?

1 February, 2023

0.002k

How to extend supply term under Gafta & Fosfa Rules

20 January, 2023

0.006k

Interlegal Trade digest Q4 2022

16 January, 2023

0.004k

Setting up and operating a joint venture in Ukraine

10 January, 2023

0.003k

What should we do if Bill of Lading is lost?

16 December, 2022

0.006k

FOSFA e-Seal for Certificates of Analysis

15 December, 2022

0.027k

Interlegal Shipping digest Q4 2022

9 December, 2022

0.005k

YACHT INSURANCE UNDER ENGLISH LAW

31 October, 2022

0.007k

EBA: Regional Business Review. Key Challenges Odessa Entrepreneurs Facing in 2022

18 October, 2022

0.003k

Blockade of the Ukrainian seaports: which problems shipping and trade faced

11 October, 2022

0.003k

Legislation in Greece: what you need to consider

28 September, 2022

0.007k

Interlegal Trade digest Q3 2022

22 September, 2022

0.004k

Buying a yacht in storage

30 August, 2022

0.003k

Smart Contracts: how the parties should defend themselves

29 August, 2022

0.005k

CORPORATE NEWS: UKRAINE AND WORLD

18 August, 2022

0.028k

Interlegal digest – SHIPPING

13 July, 2022

0.007k

Paris Memorandum Report 2021

12 July, 2022

0.004k

Why grain can’t get out of Ukraine

22 June, 2022

0.004k

The Marshall Plan for Ukraine: open issues

23 May, 2022

0.008k

Shipowner offshore company + flag for the vessel

2 May, 2022

0.004k

Sea line carriers: operation in Ukraine from 24.02.2022

22 March, 2022

0.007k

Ukrainian Legal Alert (17.02.2022)

17 February, 2022

0.003k

Interlegal Quarterly Shipping Newsletter Q4, 2021

28 December, 2021

0.005k

How banks will control foreign currency accounts of non-residents

22 October, 2021

0.003k

Interlegal Quarterly Shipping Newsletter Q3

12 October, 2021

0.004k

Soya beans: risks and loss prevention recommendations

7 October, 2021

0.003k

How can a foreigner hire employees in Ukraine?

22 September, 2021

0.006k

Ukraine Ports, Shipping & Transport News Bulletin_June_2021

2 July, 2021

0.003k

From July 11 – disclosure of information on the ownership structure of Ukrainian legal entities

1 July, 2021

0.003k

The Turkish Ministry of Transport has launched an initiative to enhance the Turkish commercial fleet!

0.001k

Interlegal prevented obtaining the Client’s cargo by fraudsters

29 June, 2021

0.004k

Interlegal Quarterly Shipping Newsletter

14 June, 2021

0.005k

Cargo insurance under CIF contracts: what should the parties to pay attention to?

4 June, 2021

0.003k

Port Dues in Ukraine: Next Step to Reform?

2 June, 2021

0.005k

Recognition of foreign judicial & arbitration awards in Ukraine

1 June, 2021

0.004k

Ukrainian grain market development: Lawyer’s opinion

20 May, 2021

0.003k

Ukraine Ports, Shipping and Transport News Bulletin April 2021

5 May, 2021

0.004k

Ever Given grounding: who is liable for carrier and forwarder delays?

29 April, 2021

0.006k

New LMAA Terms and Procedures – Coming into effect on 1 May 2021

28 April, 2021

0.006k

Probing Virgin Ground: Worries of international consultants in Ukraine

0.004k

New inland water transport law adopted in Ukraine

27 April, 2021

0.006k

Ukraine ports shipping news bulletin – march 2021

5 April, 2021

0.004k

Once again, a maritime accident has come to the attention of the international community

31 March, 2021

0.004k

Non-resident companies shall register with the Ukrainian tax authorities as payers of income tax

18 March, 2021

0.004k

NEW RULES OF LONDON ARBITRATION

11 March, 2021

0.005k

Transport, Shipping & Port News Bulletin by Interlegal

2 March, 2021

0.015k

An EVER GIVEN … event: what’s next?

1 March, 2021

0.003k

Welcome to the jungle or What should be watched out in Ukraine

12 February, 2021

0.007k

Quarterly Shipping Newsletter by Interlegal – Q1-2021

5 February, 2021

0.003k

Transport, Shipping & Port Bulletin by Interlegal

3 February, 2021

0.007k

Ukrainian Ports, Shipping and Transport News Bulletin December 2020

11 January, 2021

0.004k

November Transport, Shipping & Port News

4 December, 2020

0.004k

A victim of fraud: how to avoid it?

23 November, 2020

0.006k

QUALITY FINALITY AT THE LOADING PLACE: ENGLISH LAW APPROACH

19 November, 2020

0.007k

October Transport, Shipping & Port News

4 November, 2020

0.006k

Quarterly Shipping Newsletter by Interlegal – Q4-2020

2 November, 2020

0.006k

Recourse and subrogation in Ukraine: what should be taken into account?

30 October, 2020

0.003k

FOB delivery of goods without bearing risks

13 October, 2020

0.004k

Recent updates in the “Safe Port” warranties treatment

30 July, 2020

0.005k

BIMCO PUBLISHES COVID-19 CREW CHANGE CLAUSE

25 June, 2020

0.004k

Ship arrest in Ukraine: new approaches

18 June, 2020

0.005k

Foreign judicial awards: towards enforcement via recognition

15 June, 2020

0.003k

Old Father Dnieper Waiting for His Ships

8 June, 2020

0.1k

Crop receipts: Ukrainian experience

22 May, 2020

0.003k

How to open permanent representative office in Ukraine: step-by-step guide

20 May, 2020

0.004k

US and EU sanctions for vessel passing the Kerch Strait

7 May, 2020

0.004k

Port-Landlord Pattern for Ukraine: to Become Real Lord of Land

17 April, 2020

0.004k

Force majeure: analyze your documents free of charge

10 April, 2020

0.003k

Collecting bunker debt – when urgency matters

7 April, 2020

0.003k

COVID-19 Worldwide Update

1 April, 2020

0.004k

Establishing business in Ukraine – key points

11 December, 2019

0.004k

Share pledge in Ukraine

0.003k

Injunctions Over the Right of Disposal of Ships

4 December, 2019

0.004k

A comprehensive guide to business immigration to Ukraine

2 December, 2019

0.004k

Due diligence of a company in Ukraine

25 November, 2019

0.004k

Annotation on amendments to Turkish port regulations

13 November, 2019

0.003k

Amendment of Ukrainian legislation relating to ballast waters inspection

17 September, 2019

0.004k

Quality dispute: How proper negotiations allow to keep the contract and commercial relations

6 August, 2019

0.002k

Opportunities in the Ukraine

10 July, 2019

0.002k

Establishing business in Ukraine – key points

22 June, 2019

0.006k

Endgame or a Path to Possibilities?

24 May, 2019

0.004k

International Convention on Arrest of Ships Enters Into Force in Turkey

22 May, 2019

0.009k

Transport, Shipping, Trade Web Course Video

24 April, 2019

0.003k

Law of Ukraine on Concessions: Pros and Contras before Voting

8 April, 2019

0.003k

Sanctions of Black Sea Region countries

28 February, 2019

0.004k

LMAA arbitration notice clause

27 February, 2019

0.004k

In the wake of Agroinvestgroup

24 February, 2019

0.003k

Public Stevedoring Companies Olvia and Kherson Concession Pilot Project: how it came, how it did and what is now

27 January, 2019

0.001k

Alert on Ukrainian martial law

30 November, 2018

0.005k

Contractual clauses which should not be omitted

29 October, 2018

0.004k

Amendments to GAFTA 48 & 49 standard forms

4 October, 2018

0.007k

PROHIBITED Import/Export

6 September, 2018

0.003k

Set on the right path

31 August, 2018

0.004k

A step in the right direction

27 August, 2018

0.005k

How to buy property in Cyprus as a non-resident

9 August, 2018

0.004k

Is Russia an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction?

30 July, 2018

0.003k

How to calculate foreign income tax correctly?

4 June, 2018

0.003k

Some issues of the vessel arrest in Romania

7 May, 2018

0.004k

How to defend yourself against actions of unfair shipowner under the Bareboat Charter

4 May, 2018

0.006k

EUROPE’S HOTSPOT FOR PORT INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT

3 May, 2018

0.006k

Ship arrest in Ukraine: updated regulations

26 April, 2018

0.004k

Statistics of case consideration at the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry

17 April, 2018

0.001k

Debt for ship repair: how to avoid problems?

4 April, 2018

0.003k

Turkish authorities impose complete ban on Crimea traffic

16 March, 2018

0.005k

Interview for the Project Cargo Weekly

22 February, 2018

0.005k

Law on Privatization: what about sea ports?

2 February, 2018

0.004k

F.A.Q.Shipping in Ukraine

25 January, 2018

0.005k

How to buy floating dock at the state without loss?

11 January, 2018

0.003k

How to save 194,000 USD and to gain friends?

0.005k

General average shadows. How to refund costs: 13 years after the disaster.

0.003k

Port dues in the framework of court proceedings

28 December, 2017

0.006k

Container carriage risks in today maritime trade

23 November, 2017

0.005k

The new Rules of the ICAC at the Ukrainian CCI: Overview of novelties

16 November, 2017

0.003k

How much does the port service market cost? Calculation attempt No. 1

18 October, 2017

0.005k

Mandatory insurance policy for vessels calling at Turkish ports

20 September, 2017

0.003k

Turkish Parliament has ratified the International Convention on the Arrest of Ships 1999

12 September, 2017

0.003k

The extension of time period for transit passage in Turkish straits

1 September, 2017

0.004k

Black Sea practice newsletter, April-June 2017

5 August, 2017

0.005k

Attachment of assets of non-residents during the enforcement of decisions and awards in Ukraine

13 July, 2017

0.001k

Lease, concession and privatization of ports in Ukraine

23 June, 2017

0.003k

The ICAC at the UCCI as one of qualified options of alternative disputes resolution

15 June, 2017

0.003k

Maritime law in Ukraine

17 May, 2017

0.004k

Notice of Readiness and Demurrage: Geographical Issues in the LMAA Arbitration Award

20 April, 2017

0.003k

Direct claim against liability insurer: is it real in Ukraine?

17 April, 2017

0.003k

Peculiarities of Ship arrest in some Black Sea jurisdictions

16 March, 2017

0.004k

Automatic application of LMAA Small Claims Procedure: to apply or not to apply?

22 February, 2017

0.006k

Check points при покупке яхты

14 February, 2017

0.004k

Black Sea practice newsletter, October-December 2016

23 January, 2017

0.005k

We’ll go another way. Tailor-made Voyage Charter for large metal product exporter

11 January, 2017

0.003k

500 thousand USD for cargo deterioration

0.003k

Caution: sanctions!

21 December, 2016

0.003k

How to turn an arbitral award into recovery of damages: experience of successful recognition of the arbitral award in Georgia

28 November, 2016

0.001k

Lease, concession and privatization of ports in Ukraine

25 November, 2016

0.005k

Interview for “Yurudychna Gazeta”

31 October, 2016

0.004k

Commercial Court Practice upon Ship Arrest in Ukraine

27 October, 2016

0.006k

Newsletter, July-September

1 October, 2016

0.013k

Legal and commercial aspects of ship repair activity

26 September, 2016

0.007k

Interlegal LegalCare for the trader: calm in a few cents per ton of cargo

20 September, 2016

0.006k

Trends in the Ukrainian maritime law service market

16 September, 2016

0.003k

Newsletter, July-September

1 September, 2016

0.006k

Ukrainian freight forwarder’s liability in international cargo transportation by road

29 August, 2016

0.004k

Port privatization as strategic goal is a must

16 August, 2016

0.005k

Enforcement of commercial (maritime) foreign arbitral awards in Ukraine

8 August, 2016

0.004k

Enforcement of commercial (maritime) foreign arbitral awards in Ukraine

6 August, 2016

0.005k

Cargo Shortage Fines – Turkey

1 August, 2016

0.004k

Interim measures in the process of enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Ukraine

10 April, 2016

0.002k

Occupation of the territory of Ukraine in focus of maritime law

4 April, 2016

0.005k

Once again on freight forwarding in Ukraine

1 April, 2016

0.006k

Lien as security of obligations in merchant shipping

24 February, 2016

0.003k

The third is the charm! Large bulker fleet operator vs. Shipowner and P&I

11 January, 2016

0.008k

The demurrage begins with…

0.006k

How to succeed with a demurrage claim or “not to shot yourself in the foot”

9 December, 2015

0.003k

What a Foreign Buyer Should Know about Export of Goods from Ukraine – Customs Clearance not Completed

19 October, 2015

0.001k

How sea-going vessels are arrested in Ukraine without arrest: absurdist theatre

6 October, 2015

0.003k

Sanctions & liability for Calling at Crimean ports: update – August 2015

17 September, 2015

0.005k

International Forum on Seafarers Education, Training and Crewing

10 September, 2015

0.01k

Jurisdictions of Black Sea countries: crisis aggravates

23 August, 2015

0.008k

Carriers’ and forwarders’ responsibility. Why you should keep an eye on it in Ukrainian business realia?

17 August, 2015

0.002k

Sanctions & liability for Calling at Crimean ports: update

17 July, 2015

0.003k

Force-Majeure: practical legal consequences

25 June, 2015

0.005k

EU-Ukraine Association Agreement -chase has started

23 March, 2015

0.003k

Setoff of Mutual Claims in Arbitration Proceedings

26 February, 2015

0.003k

Everything you say may be used against you, or what does the term «Without prejudice» mean

25 February, 2015

0.003k

Force-Majeure: Legislative Novelties in Ukraine

23 February, 2015

0.005k

Maritime Law

10 February, 2015

0.005k

Customs Valuation of Goods Imported to Ukraine: Practical & Legal Issues

1 December, 2014

0.003k

The Problems and perspectives of the salvage on the Danube River

26 November, 2014

0.008k

Ukrainе – EU Association Agreement – in focus Trade, Maritime and Customs

24 November, 2014

0.004k

Wrong Arbitration Clause Can Bring in Winning Award Lie Waste

7 November, 2014

0.003k

Force majeure with regard to service providers’ liability (Ukrainian practice)

4 November, 2014

0.003k

Crimean Ports: Now and After

30 September, 2014

0.005k

International Commercial Arbitration and Maritime Arbitration in Ukraine in 2013

8 September, 2014

0.005k

Arrest of vessels in Black sea countries

7 September, 2014

0.003k

General view on service providers’ liability in Ukraine

2 September, 2014

0.004k

Crimean Ports: Possible Solutions

1 July, 2014

0.005k

Property rights to be protected in Crimea: how and when?

30 June, 2014

0.003k

Maritime law in Ukraine

0.005k

Ports in disputed Crimea could lose cargo to their Kiev-loyal rivals

20 May, 2014

0.005k

International Commercial Arbitration and Maritime Arbitration in Ukraine in 2013

15 May, 2014

0.003k

CRIMEA AND MARITIME SECTOR: STORY TO BE CONTINUED

12 May, 2014

0.005k

Maritime arbitration: why mainly London?

29 April, 2014

0.008k

Changing shape of eastern Europe

25 April, 2014

0.005k

P&I Tips

24 April, 2014

0.007k

Crimean Kaleidoscope (Recent business & legal developments)

4 April, 2014

0.031k

“Nationalization” and other “legal” developments in Crimea

26 March, 2014

0.007k

And Ships of Every Flag Shall Come?

17 March, 2014

0.004k

Possessory lien on cargo in the Black Sea: how to do it in Ukraine

14 March, 2014

0.005k

Ukraine strives to control transshipment in Kerch Strait

12 February, 2014

0.029k

Non-conformity of the data about cargos on board of the sea-going vessel and master’s responsibility

29 January, 2014

0.002k

New Procedure on Taking Security Measures

28 January, 2014

0.003k

Winter does not come suddenly: maritime industry should be prepared

18 December, 2013

0.003k

M/V “LACONIC” was arrested in the port of Illyichevsk because of collision

13 December, 2013

0.003k

Registration of shipping lines: same course, new lines

4 December, 2013

0.005k

Sudden Winter

30 November, 2013

0.003k

Tips on enforcement of foreign arbitral awards against state-owned companies in Ukraine

27 November, 2013

0.005k

Ballast mayhem in Ukrainian ports: end of an era?

0.006k

Liens on cargo: the nuances of Ukrainian law

20 November, 2013

0.003k

PORT DUES AND TARRIFFS IN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE

13 November, 2013

0.009k

Forwarder’s Liability for Cargo Loss and its Insurance in Ukraine – Part II

6 November, 2013

0.006k

UKRAINE: Tips for enforcement of arbitral awards in maritime disputes

31 October, 2013

0.004k

Forwarder’s Liability for Cargo Loss and its Insurance in Ukraine PART 1

29 October, 2013

0.004k

Vessel arrest and detention in Georgia. Part 3

25 September, 2013

0.003k

ACCORDING TO ARBITRATION – UNTIL YOU PAY YOU ARE NOT IN DISPUTE

20 September, 2013

0.003k

Vessel arrest and detention in Georgia. Part 2

18 September, 2013

0.008k

Shipowner beware: undeclared ship stores

11 September, 2013

0.005k

Vessel arrest and detention in Georgia. Part 1

4 September, 2013

0.005k

Detention of ships and cargo by port authorities

21 August, 2013

0.007k

Open international registry on the horizon

31 July, 2013

0.005k

Out-of-gauge adventures

26 July, 2013

0.011k

Port industry reawakens with Law on Sea Ports

17 July, 2013

0.004k

Port Development Reform in Ukraine

1 July, 2013

0.005k

Seven Countries, Seven Sets of Rules

27 June, 2013

0.006k

Ukrainian shipbuilding: awaiting a renaissance

5 June, 2013

0.004k

Freight-forwarder liability at a glance

29 May, 2013

0.036k

Enforcement of foreign court interim decisions in Ukraine not so simple

8 May, 2013

0.03k

Arrest of ships: complexity remains

17 April, 2013

0.004k

REFORMING UKRAINE: New law privatizes ports

16 April, 2013

0.005k

Maritime & intermodal development in Ukraine: A real reform

10 April, 2013

0.004k

Is Ukraine becoming friendly jurisdiction?

8 February, 2013

0.004k

Costa Concordia: the last cruise

11 January, 2013

0.004k

Up to date Global Challenges

18 December, 2012

0.008k

Shiparrested practical guide

4 December, 2012

0.006k

Sea ports оf Ukraine are to be: in concession.

26 November, 2012

0.003k

Arbitration Watch Gafta case

20 November, 2012

0.004k

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Court Judgments & Arbitration Awards in Ukraine

8 November, 2012

0.031k

MARINE INSURANCE AND LEGAL PRACTICE

6 November, 2012

0.004k

1st Black Sea Port&Shipping

29 October, 2012

0.025k

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Court Judgments & Arbitration Awards in Ukraine

25 October, 2012

0.006k

Pirates of the Ukrainian Sea

28 September, 2012

0.004k

If at first you don’t succeed…

10 September, 2012

0.004k

Ukraine paves the way for privatization

26 June, 2012

0.03k

Law on Sea Ports of Ukraine: First Impressions

0.053k

Ukraine: ILO Announces Lists of Licenses and Permits Needed for Dredging Works

19 June, 2012

0.003k

Forwarder’s Liability as a Consignee under Bill of Lading – a Ukrainian Perspective

16 February, 2012

0.003k

Vision before strategy

28 November, 2011

0.003k

Legal life in… Ukraine

5 September, 2011

0.033k