24/7

Experts of Interlegal proved - the seizure of ship’s store by the Odessa Customs Office was unlawful

16 июля 2018 г.: ru 5 en 218 июля 2018 г.: ru 4 en 519 июля 2018 г.: ru 2 en 1 всего: 42 04.08.15

On 28.03.2015 customs inspection was performed by the Odessa Customs Officer of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine on board of the foreign vessel at the Ilyichevsk Fish Sea Port. As the result, 3 bulletproof vests, 3 helmets and 3 pairs of ballistic protective glasses were found on the master’s bridge in visible place, unconcealed from customs inspection.

The Odessa Customs Officer assumed that the aforesaid items were deemed as arms and ammunition and should have been declared in compliance with Article 335 of the Customs Code of Ukraine.

As the result, the protocol was issued against the master of the vessel, the citizen of India, upon violation of customs procedure pursuant to Article 482 of the Customs Code of Ukraine (carriage or actions aimed at the carriage of goods, vehicles of commercial use through customs border of Ukraine out of the customs control) and the items, allegedly deemed as object of customs procedure violation, were seized until receipt of the court ruling upon administrative proceeding.

Having analyzed the situation, lawyers of Interlegal concluded that actions of customs office were illegal. The seized items are not treated as the goods of commercial use but as ship’s stores that should not be declared, inter alia, as personal protective gear used to protect seamen during sailing in unsafe areas with high risk of pirate attacks, in particular, the Gulf of Aden (Somalia, Yemen, Oman), Strait of Malacca (Malaysia) and the Gulf of Guinea (Nigeria, Cameroon, Ghana). Thus, the seized ship’s stores were purchased by the Shipowner for the purpose of crew protection.

Having studied arguments of the lawyers of Interlegal, the court ordered to close the case proceedings due to absence of the elements of administrative offense in the master’s actions and to return the seized ship’s store to its owner.

Having disagreed with the first instance court ruling, customs office filed an appeal. Having studied case materials, the court of appeal confirmed that the first instance court applied substantial and procedural law correctly. Therefore the appeal was rejected and the order of the first instance court remained unchanged.

This precedent is vital for court practice because the courts often made decisions in favour of customs office upon such disputes.

The Interlegal team under the associate partner Artem Skorobogatov, worked upon the case.

  • Mediation: Interlegal lawyers settled the dispute under the Ship Repair Contract2020.06.25

    The Client – foreign shipowner applied to Interlegal for dispute settlement due to its indebtedness under the Ship Repair Contract. COVID...

    show more
  • Interlegal yachting lawyers supported insurance event upon recovery of 60,000 EUR2020.06.25

    Interlegal regular client declared on insurance event concerning tender insured by our partners – Marine Services Group at one of the larges...

    show more
  • Interlegal facilitated defense of freight forwarder’s interests against container line2020.06.22

    Freight forwarder applied to Interlegal due to cargo damage that occurred during carriage by sea. Freight forwarder, on behalf of its cli...

    show more
  • Interlegal settled the dispute upon non-payment for the goods by large Chinese importer2020.06.18

    Interlegal succeeded in pretrial dispute settlement. The Client, engaged in pine timber export to China, applied for defense of its rights a...

    show more
  • Interlegal lawyers supported 4 deals in fleet sale & purchase2020.06.17

    Pandemic is not an obstacle for vessel sale & purchase! Despite COVID-19 epidemic and quarantine restrictions, spring 2020 was full of d...

    show more
  • Interlegal is still representing Odessa in Best Lawyers rating2020.06.12

    Interlegal partners Arthur Nitsevych and Artem Skorobogatov confirmed their positions in four nominations of the popular rating Best Lawyers...

    show more
  • Interlegal succeeded in closing ten loans2020.06.10

    The Client filed a request to Interlegal upon legal assistance in support of closing ten loans. Interlegal team had two tasks: 1. To min...

    show more
  • Work flow chart upon declaration of dividends2020.06.01

    The Client applied to Interlegal upon tax issue. As the Ukrainian citizen and resident, the Client received dividends from the foreign compa...

    show more
  • Interlegal lawyers consulted the client upon applying the instrument of agrarian receipts2020.05.20

    The Client – large foreign investment fund filed a request to Interlegal regarding mechanisms upon securing fulfillment of the Debtor’s obli...

    show more
  • Interlegal drafted new combined service agreement on cargo handling2020.05.18

    The Client – large Ukrainian sea port operator engaged, in particular, in rendering services of export & import operations, as well as l...

    show more