Interlegal defended successfully interests of the large grain trader from UAE

1 мая 2019 г.: ru 1 en 12 мая 2019 г.: ru 1 en 130 октября 2019 г.: ru 2 всего: 13 25.04.14

The dispute arose from the contract whereupon the Seller was obliged to supply 30,000.0 MTS of barley (on FOB terms) and the Buyer, whose interests were represented by Interlegal, was obliged to accept and to pay for the cargo. Cargo handling was delayed for nine days as per contract terms. The cause of such delay was the Seller’s contestation against the result of draft survey and weight of supplied cargo.

During negotiations, in order not to increase the demurrage amount, the Parties agreed that final weight of supplied cargo shall be determined in the port of discharge. Full payment for supplied cargo shall be performed after the final weight is fixed. The demurrage amount for nine days resulted to 132,450.00 US dollars. The claim on payment of this amount was secured against the Seller.

Survey at the discharging port showed that the Seller supplied 94,725 MTS more than stated in bills of lading.

Therefore the Seller (whose interests were represented by English lawyers) requested the Buyer to pay 23,491.80 US dollars for 94,725 MTS of cargo supplied by the Seller and accepted by the Buyer over the contract volume.

Also, the Seller submitted its own calculation of laytime at the loading port which stated that the vessel was not on demurrage but loading was performed before completion of laytime. Therefore the Seller claimed for dispatch in the amount of 1,192.71 US dollars. Moreover, the Seller claimed interest for delay in payment in the amount of 17,066.34 US dollars. Therefore the amount of the Seller’s claim made up 41,750.85 US dollars. In order to prevent increase of fine for delay in payment under the contract the lawyers of Interlegal have signed escrow agreement whereupon the Buyer shall pay indisputable price for the cargo and the demurrage amount (132,450.00 US dollars) shall be deducted from cargo value and shall be placed on escrow account until the Parties settle the dispute amicably or by means of arbitration.

In the process of negotiations experts from Interlegal proved unlawfulness of dispatch accrual by the Seller and provided for amicable settlement of dispute by the Parties. As the result, the Parties performed an offset of their claims and the balance was removed from escrow account in Buyer’s favour.

Proper involvement of Dmitriy Zagorodnyuk and Andrey Perepelitsa, experts from Interlegal, resulted in defense of the Client’s interests and decreased costs avoiding arbitration proceeding expences.

  • Interlegal won the court dispute against large state-owned stevedore2020.09.08

      The Client – port operator – applied to Interlegal for due diligence of one of state-owned stevedores. Such due dil...

    show more
  • Discharge of cargo residues and washwater: instruments of legal defense for Interlegal client2020.09.04

      Since the State Enterprise “Ukrainian Sea Ports Authority” (USPA), jointly with other governmental bodies (such as the State Borde...

    show more
  • Interlegal defended interests of “thyssenkrupp Materials Trading GmbH” in Court of Appeal of Donetsk2020.09.03

      Recently, in Court of Appeal of Donetsk there was a hearing of a case concerning an appeal against the ruling of Kramatorsk Town C...

    show more
  • Interlegal defended world freight forwarder`s interests in court, allowing no damages recover totaling up to UAH 15 million2020.09.01

    Interlegal got a request from a Client, one of the world's largest forwarders, to protect his interests in enforcement proceedings to recove...

    show more
  • Group of companies: structuring as a holding company2020.08.17

    The client – large foreign shipowner applied to Interlegal upon corporate issues regarding Liberian companies acting as nominal shipowners....

    show more
  • Interlegal lawyers refunded costs for a cancelled travel2020.08.11

    A Client apply to Interlegal for refund of costs on travel to exotic country – naturally being cancelled due to closing borders and cancelli...

    show more
  • Yacht Charter Parties 2020: what to stipulate in autumn?2020.08.06

    In the framework of regular services for one of our Client’s commercial yachts, Interlegal supported conclusion of Charter Parties in autumn...

    show more
  • Ship arrest preserved: the Debtor paid due amount2020.08.05

    On March 24, 2020, we wrote that Interlegal lawyers arrested the vessel flying under foreign flag, in Kherson Sea Port water area, followed...

    show more
  • Ship arrest as operating mechanism for debt recovery2020.08.10

    The Client – large foreign bunkering company applied to Interlegal for debt recovery from the Shipowner for bunker supply. Interlegal law...

    show more
  • Maritime claim as grounds for amicable settlement2020.08.04

    The Client – large Ukrainian stevedoring company applied to Interlegal for reimbursement of damages caused by the vessel in the process of c...

    show more