Interlegal managed to facilitate dispute consideration by the Ukrainian court

22 марта 2018 г.: en 1 всего: 1 11.04.16

As it known, most House and Line Bills of Lading provide an alternative clause under which the debtor may be brought to responsibility either under its location or under location of the creditor (forwarder/line carrier).

Experts of Interlegal dealt with such clause in one of the latest case proceedings upon freight and container demurrage charge against the Ukrainian consignee. According to the Bill of Lading:

All actions against carrier under the contract of carriage evidenced by this Multimodal Transport Document shall be brought before the High Court of Bombay, India, and no other Court shall have jurisdiction with regards to any such action. Actions against the Merchant under the contract of carriage evidenced by this bill of lading may be brought before the High Court of Bombay, India, or, in Carrier’s sole discretion, in another court of competent jurisdiction”.

It was a great surprise when the Ukrainian court, having accepted the case to consideration, after several court hearings ordered to cease the case proceedings a) due to arbitration clause under which the dispute shall be settled by the High Court of Bombay, and b) due to application of the Indian law to the dispute.

The court of appeal supported this conclusion in full and left the first instance court decision unchanged.

In the process of cassation claim consideration by the Supreme Commercial Court of Ukraine, the court’s attention was drawn to the fact that the debtor was the Ukrainian resident; therefore, jointly with alternative clause of the Bill of Lading, it shall serve as grounds for dispute consideration at the territory of Ukraine. The need in dispute consideration under the foreign law provisions shall not also facilitate case proceedings cessation, since the Ukrainian law not only provides such opportunity but also stipulates the content determination procedure concerning such provisions.

Cassation claim was satisfied in full. As the result, the case was submitted to the first instance court for consideration on the merits.

Alexey Remeslo and Karina Gorovaya, experts of Interlegal, worked upon the case.


  • Interlegal consulted IT-company upon specifications for applying NDA in Ukraine2019.11.06

    A foreign company engaged in AI, Big Data, IoT, software installation and maintenance, applied to Interlegal. The company planned to expand...

    show more
  • Interlegal lawyers won the LCIA Arbitration case amounting to 660 thousand USD2019.11.06

    The Ukrainian grain supplier engaged in large-scale international business applied to Interlegal for debt recovery from the Buyer (British C...

    show more
  • Interlegal acted as creditor’s legal adviser in the dispute against PJSC “Ukrzaliznytsia”2019.10.31

    Interlegal lawyers facilitated evidence base aimed to confirm the large transport and forwarding company’s claims against PJSC “Ukrzaliznyts...

    show more
  • Interlegal won one more case in favour of thyssenkrupp Materials Trading GmbH2019.10.28

    Interlegal applied to Kramatorsk City Court in Donetsk Region on recognizing ICAC at the UCCI Award on debt recovery from the Ukrainian comp...

    show more
  • Interlegal lawyers facilitated avoidance of quality dispute2019.10.28

    Having applied to Interlegal in due time, the Client, acting as the Seller under the Sales Contract, prevented dispute upon supplied goods q...

    show more
  • Interlegal lawyers facilitated cancelling decision of State Environmental Inspection by the court2019.10.16

    Interlegal lawyers, acting in the defense of foreign shipowner’s interests, asked the court to recognize as unlawful and cancel the above of...

    show more
  • Interlegal lawyers settled the dispute upon indebtedness for ship repair services2019.10.10

    The Client, large shiprepair yard, applied to Interlegal for solving the problem due to improper performance of Ship Repair Contract regardi...

    show more
  • GAFTA Fumigation Rules 132: new grounds for demurrage contestation?2019.10.02

    Interlegal lawyers defended the Seller’s CIF claim on demurrage recovery arisen at the discharge port. he Client applied to Interlegal du...

    show more
  • Interlegal lawyers recovered bunker debt from the Romanian Debtor amounting to 300,000 USD2019.09.26

    The Client, foreign bunkering company, applied to Interlegal for bunker debt recovery from the Romanian company engaged in maritime operatio...

    show more
  • Interlegal closed the deal on vessel purchase at the EU aftermarket2019.09.23

    Interlegal lawyers succeeded in legal support and closing the deal on second-hand vessel purchase (tanker 5,000 DWT) at the EU aftermarket....

    show more