Interlegal won GAFTA arbitration amounting to $ 300,000 in favour of Ukrainian agrarian trader

31 января : ru 7 en 23 февраля : ru 2 en 121 февраля : ru 1 en 1 всего: 125 29.01.20

Interlegal won GAFTA arbitration upon the dispute concerning the Buyer’s full non-payment for whet bran, FOB delivery from Nikolayev to Izmir.

The Seller fulfilled its contractual obligations in full, followed by loading the goods on board of the vessel and submitting payment documents. But the Buyer did not make payment in due time: first provided false SWIFT, then contested payment amount based on supply of allegedly unsound goods under the previous contract and requested for discount. Following the goods delivery to Izmir sea port, the Buyer, despite cargo retention by the Seller and the latter’s prohibition to discharge, took the goods unlawfully against LOI.

After long-term negotiations with the Buyer, the Seller applied to GAFTA arbitration for debt recovery. At this stage, Interlegal lawyers faced the issue to bring third party to liability. Formally, the English company was the Buyer under the Contract, while in fact the Contract was performed (instructions, correspondence) mainly via mail server of the Turkish company engaged in similar activity. The Turkish company signed and sealed the Contract as the Guarantor.

An option to enforce decision against the Guarantor was a matter of concern for the Client. Interlegal lawyers drafted justified legal position and persuaded arbitrators in the Seller’s right to charge indebtedness both from the Buyer and from the Guarantor.
Interlegal lawyer ?Valeria Ivanova, represented the Client’s interests at GAFTA arbitration.


  • English arbitrations: how do they operate during pandemics?2020.04.01

    The issue of English arbitration institution effective functioning is vital both for Interlegal clients and for lawyers of Interlegal Englis...

    show more
  • De-offshoring and its impact on shipowners?2020.03.31

    Today, non-resident company’s bank account is an urgent need for international business. Cooperation with offshore companies is a common...

    show more
  • How to refund costs for the lost tour?2020.03.30

    A Client applied to Interlegal upon cost refund for the tour to exotic country being cancelled due to global quarantine on the Earth. Des...

    show more
  • Debt recovery should not be postponed2020.03.27

    The Client applied to Interlegal for charging accounts receivable in the framework of its contractual relations. With reference to media...

    show more
  • Force majeure: critical view2020.03.27

    The Client applied to Interlegal for assessment of presence / absence of force majeure in the framework of its contractual relations. Hav...

    show more
  • Interlegal lawyers arrested the vessel for ship repair indebtedness2020.03.24

    Interlegal lawyers arrested in Kherson Sea Port water area the vessel flying under foreign flag. The Client applied to Interlegal on ship...

    show more
  • Will we face more difficulties in contract performance?2020.03.23

    As expected, global quarantine due to COVID-19 pandemics essentially affected shipping and international trade in Black Sea Region. For t...

    show more
  • Banking re-compliance for the current bank clients2020.03.16

    It is not a secret for international business company owners that banking compliance becomes a more complex procedure covering the wider ran...

    show more
  • Causal fact recognition by the court2020.03.03

    A Client applied to Interlegal for legal assistance in the framework of Personal Attorney Service. As found out in the process of inherit...

    show more
  • Partnership agreement in the framework of educational project2020.03.02

    Gentleman’s agreements are widely spread in the Ukrainian business practice. In such situations business partners, while holding negotiation...

    show more