The Appeal Court of Odessa Region has confirmed the first instance court decision upon the dispute between the Client and the Southern Customs Office
On the 26th of September 2014 the Appeal Court of Odessa Region left unchanged the Odessa Malinovskiy District Court decision upon closing the proceeding on bringing the Forwarder to administrative responsibility due to wrong classification of goods in the process of declaring thereof.
Let us remind the matter stated in the news dd. the 18th of August 2014:
On the 30th of May 2014 the Southern Customs Office of the Ministry of Incomes detained a set of lanterns carried from China to Transnistria via the Odessa Commercial Sea Port.
These goods were declared by the employees of the Ukrainian Transport & Forwarding Company on the grounds of documents submitted by the Client.
There were no violations detected during three inspections but the Southern Customs initiated the merchandising expertise in order to determine the code of goods under the Ukrainian Customs Commodity Classification Codes for Foreign Trade. Having obtained the results of expertise, the Customs considered that the lanterns were electrical shockers. Therefore it made a Protocol on violation of customs rules under Article 472 of the Customs Code of Ukraine, which provides confiscation of goods and fine in the amount of 100% of the cost thereof.
Lawyers from Interlegal managed to prove absence of elements of the violation (subjective aspect) in the declarant’s actions.
According to the Odessa Malinovskiy District Court decision dd. the 7th of August 2014, the case upon bringing the declarant to administrative responsibility was closed and the Southern Customs Office was entitled to return the seized goods.
Therefore the Odessa Region Appeal Court dd. the 26th of September 2014 confirmed illegal actions of the Southern Customs upon causeless detention of goods for more than two months.
- English arbitrations: how do they operate during pandemics?2020.04.01
The issue of English arbitration institution effective functioning is vital both for Interlegal clients and for lawyers of Interlegal Englis...show more
- De-offshoring and its impact on shipowners?2020.03.31
Today, non-resident company’s bank account is an urgent need for international business. Cooperation with offshore companies is a common...show more
- How to refund costs for the lost tour?2020.03.30
A Client applied to Interlegal upon cost refund for the tour to exotic country being cancelled due to global quarantine on the Earth. Des...show more
- Debt recovery should not be postponed2020.03.27
The Client applied to Interlegal for charging accounts receivable in the framework of its contractual relations. With reference to media...show more
- Force majeure: critical view2020.03.27
The Client applied to Interlegal for assessment of presence / absence of force majeure in the framework of its contractual relations. Hav...show more
- Interlegal lawyers arrested the vessel for ship repair indebtedness2020.03.24
Interlegal lawyers arrested in Kherson Sea Port water area the vessel flying under foreign flag. The Client applied to Interlegal on ship...show more
- Will we face more difficulties in contract performance?2020.03.23
As expected, global quarantine due to COVID-19 pandemics essentially affected shipping and international trade in Black Sea Region. For t...show more
- Banking re-compliance for the current bank clients2020.03.16
It is not a secret for international business company owners that banking compliance becomes a more complex procedure covering the wider ran...show more
- Causal fact recognition by the court2020.03.03
A Client applied to Interlegal for legal assistance in the framework of Personal Attorney Service. As found out in the process of inherit...show more
- Partnership agreement in the framework of educational project2020.03.02
Gentleman’s agreements are widely spread in the Ukrainian business practice. In such situations business partners, while holding negotiation...show more