Is Russia an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction?
3 августа 2018 г.: ru 2 en 52 августа 2018 г.: ru 2 en 311 августа 2018 г.: ru 1 en 1 всего: 8030.07.18
International arbitration development has given rise to the theory of delocalizing international commercial arbitration, i.e. its international legal nature and supranational scope of activities which detach it from state control and supervision, while the state should only assist and facilitate foreign entities functioning at its own territory. However, today global practice not always confirms such theory. Many countries do not even provide the laws on arbitration proceedings and thus do not recognize international commercial arbitration itself, while some other states restrict essentially arbitration tribunal activities.
Therefore, under such criteria, we may classify all jurisdictions as arbitration friendly, from one hand, and unfriendly, from the other hand, while each legal institution determines quite an unambiguous tendency as acting in one direction or another.
International arbitration forms are largely diversified. There are three distinct forms of international commercial arbitration:
- a) permanent arbitration tribunal;
- b) the arbitration tribunal created for consideration and settlement of a specific dispute ad hoc;
- c) administered arbitration tribunal, as a specific arbitration form, i.e. intermediate arbitration between ad hoc arbitration and permanent arbitration as arbitration institution, since permanent arbitration tribunal or any other private commercial organization, acting under conditions prescribed by special rules, administers ad hoc arbitration functioning.
However, some authors, in particular native ones, do not treat the latter form of international commercial arbitration as an independent one. They treat administrative arbitration as a type of ad hoc arbitration, while others, on the contrary, treat is as a special type of permanent arbitration. According to the latter opinion, international commercial arbitration is divided into administered and non-administered one. Non-administered arbitration is certainly ad hoc arbitration, while administered arbitration proceedings combine all the arbitration forms into a single category.
In fact, there may be many classifications of international commercial arbitration, while a keystone in this regard means that quite clear classification criteria include nature or degree of administering arbitration. Recently relations aimed at administering arbitration in the Russian Federation were governed by the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation dd. 25.06.2016 which approved the Rules for granting the right to act as permanent arbitration institution. According to the Order, as of 01.11.2017 only four arbitration institutions are entitled to act as permanent arbitration institutions and to administer arbitration proceedings.
Decisions of organizations having no right to administer arbitration may be recognized as to be canceled or may cause such legal effects as a rejection to issue an enforcement order. We may assume that such restrictions provide a negative tendency.
Instead of conclusion
Recently there have emerged and intensified tendencies which cast doubt on the Russian Federation as an international arbitration-friendly state. If previously there were no problems on administering arbitration or enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in Russia, today such problems occur, in particular, with regard to recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards.
In general, since Russia is a party to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards dd. 1958, enforcement of arbitration awards in Russia is maintained at the sufficient level. Recently the North Caucasus District Arbitration Court made a decision dd. 21.09.2017 under case No. A32-1593/2016 upon recognition and enforcement of the GAFTA Arbitration Award No. 15-190 dd. 28.09.2015 made at the territory of the United Kingdom at the request of Grain Export LLS, Seychelles.
Published at http://forwarderlaw.comAuthor: Arthur Nitsevych
Statistics of case consideration at the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry2018.04.17
This publication is the adapted version of the report by Nikolay Selivon, President of ICAC at the UCCI, upon the ICAC operation results in...show more
The new Rules of the ICAC at the Ukrainian CCI: Overview of novelties2017.11.16
The International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry was established in 1992 under the recommend...show more
The ICAC at the UCCI as one of qualified options of alternative disputes resolution2017.06.15
Ukraine is one of the leading exporting players of the global agricultural trade market. The orientation of the Ukrainian economy, including...show more
Enforcement of commercial (maritime) foreign arbitral awards in Ukraine2016.08.08
Resolution of maritime disputes by reference to international commercial arbitration is a typical situation in a modern globalized world. Un...show more
Setoff of Mutual Claims in Arbitration Proceedings2015.02.26
It is well known that arbitration is the most common means of resolving commercial disputes today. The advantage of arbitration is also lies...show more
New Procedure on Taking Security Measures2014.01.28
Taking security measures in support of international arbitration (hereinafter - interim measures) remains a pressing problem in Ukraine. To...show more
International Commercial Arbitration and Maritime Arbitration in Ukraine in 20132014.09.08
International commercial and maritime arbitration in the Ukraine are administered by the International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) a...show more
Wrong Arbitration Clause Can Bring in Winning Award Lie Waste2014.11.07
As we know, foreign economic activity is governed by international law and national laws of states involved in such relationships. Sometimes...show more
International Commercial Arbitration and Maritime Arbitration in Ukraine in 20132014.05.15
International Commercial Arbitration Court and Maritime Arbitration committee at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry issued a rep...show more
Maritime arbitration: why mainly London?2014.04.29
A question often asked is “Why do so many parties choose London as the center for their arbitration in maritime contracts?” Nowadays busines...show more