Interlegal lawyers returned 80,000 USD under the Charter Party
12 сентября : ru 28 en 116 сентября : ru 6 en 313 сентября : ru 10 всего: 66 12.09.19
The Client and the Shipowner concluded the Charter Party in 2017.
Having received by email the Offer, stating that commencement of cooperation between the Parties requires for advance payment under the Charter Party amounting to 80,000 USD, the Client made advance payment.
Further the Shipowner evade performance of the Charter Party with reference to financial difficulties, problems with customs office, port agents, non-performance of formalities regarding the Vessel, followed by cancelling the Charter Party.
But the Client’s advance payment still remained non-returned, keeping no contact with the Client.
Having analyzed the provided documents, Interlegal lawyers stated the following:
- having concluded the Charter Party and requesting for 80,000 USD, the Shipowner knew that the Vessel cannot be used for performance of the Charter Party;
- the Shipowners committed actions beyond its civil obligations;
- the Shipowners committed actions with elements of criminal offense.
Interlegal lawyers drafted and filled the application on crime commitment, having provided to the pretrial investigation body all the evidence serving as grounds for initiating criminal proceedings.
Due to initiating numerous investigative actions aimed at obtaining evidence on the merits, the Client had advance payment amounting to 80,000 USD returned.
Interlegal lawyers drafted for the Client agreement on yacht charter management2019.11.28
A client filed a request to Interlegal upon documentation required for yacht chartering. The Client planned to conclude agreement on yacht c...show more
Interlegal lawyers defended interests of German transport companies in three court proceedings simultaneously2019.11.13
Interlegal lawyers applied to Kozelets District Court in Chernigov Region on recognizing several German court decisions on damage and intere...show more
Interlegal consulted IT-company upon specifications for applying NDA in Ukraine2019.11.06
A foreign company engaged in AI, Big Data, IoT, software installation and maintenance, applied to Interlegal. The company planned to expand...show more
Interlegal lawyers won the LCIA Arbitration case amounting to 660 thousand USD2019.11.06
The Ukrainian grain supplier engaged in large-scale international business applied to Interlegal for debt recovery from the Buyer (British C...show more
Interlegal acted as creditor’s legal adviser in the dispute against PJSC “Ukrzaliznytsia”2019.10.31
Interlegal lawyers facilitated evidence base aimed to confirm the large transport and forwarding company’s claims against PJSC “Ukrzaliznyts...show more
Interlegal won one more case in favour of thyssenkrupp Materials Trading GmbH2019.10.28
Interlegal applied to Kramatorsk City Court in Donetsk Region on recognizing ICAC at the UCCI Award on debt recovery from the Ukrainian comp...show more
Interlegal lawyers facilitated avoidance of quality dispute2019.10.28
Having applied to Interlegal in due time, the Client, acting as the Seller under the Sales Contract, prevented dispute upon supplied goods q...show more
Interlegal lawyers facilitated cancelling decision of State Environmental Inspection by the court2019.10.16
Interlegal lawyers, acting in the defense of foreign shipowner’s interests, asked the court to recognize as unlawful and cancel the above of...show more
Interlegal lawyers settled the dispute upon indebtedness for ship repair services2019.10.10
The Client, large shiprepair yard, applied to Interlegal for solving the problem due to improper performance of Ship Repair Contract regardi...show more
GAFTA Fumigation Rules 132: new grounds for demurrage contestation?2019.10.02
Interlegal lawyers defended the Seller’s CIF claim on demurrage recovery arisen at the discharge port. he Client applied to Interlegal du...show more