24/7

Interlegal successfully defended the Indian shipowner’s interests

15 декабря 2017 г.: ru 1 en 219 марта 2017 г.: ru 1 en 128 декабря 2023 г.: ru 2 всего: 44 25.06.14

M/V “BON VENT” was chartered to deliver cargo from the Port of Nikolayev, Ukraine, to the one of the Port of Bender Abbas or Port of Bender Imam Khomeini, Iran.

Vessel was chartered to deliver cargo from the Port of Nikolayev, Ukraine, to the one of the Port of Bender Abbas or Port of Bender Imam Khomeini, Iran. The Owner stated that Charterer failed to pay freight, hence initiated arbitration proceedings, performed their right on cargo lien and on March 14, 2014, discharged the cargo at the port of Bender Imam Khomeini, Iran.

On April 11, 2014, the Charterers and the Consignee concluded the Settlement Agreement, which stipulated, that the lien on cargo was lawful. Despite the arrangements the Charterers sued and arrested the Vessel in the port of Yuzhny (Ukraine) on the basis of the investigative judge ruling as the instrument of crime commitment.

The Owners instructed INTERLEGAL to protect their and crewmember`s rights and interests in criminal proceeding and release the Vessel.

INTERLEGAL proved the absence of corpus delicti and grounds for the Vessel arrest, so it was cancelled. After that two consecutive arrests of the Vessel as itself and arrest of the ship`s documents on the basis of the investigative judge сrulings followed.

INTERLEGAL appealed against all the rulings and succeeded to cancel all of them in the Court of Appeal of Nikolayev region.

Ship owner’s interests were represented by Sergey Kalitenko and Alexey Remeslo, senior lawyers of Interlegal, under the general supervision of Artem Skorobogatov, associated partner.

 

Shipowner of MV «Bon Vent»: «I appreciate all of your entire team’s efforts and congratulations once again on this victory. It is indeed a big victory».

  • The Buyer failed to fulfill its financial obligations within deadline prescribed by the contract2024.05.23

    A client, seller who entered into contracts with two companies of the same group, applied to Interlegal. The contracts provided supply o...

    show more
  • Limassol Boat Show 20242024.05.15

    We are pleased to announce that on 23-26 May Interlegal will be participating in the ninth edition of the largest boat show in the Eas...

    show more
  • General average due to collision of vessels. What should the cargo owner do?2024.03.18

    Expansion of geography to the Caspian states was and is one of the goals of our company development. Therefore, we are particularly plea...

    show more
  • Misunderstanding and technical errors as the reason for dispute2024.02.12

    A company applied to Interlegal for carrying out claims handling with their counterparty. Due to a simple misunderstanding, business rel...

    show more
  • What are the legal effects of delivering goods of poor quality under CIF contract?2024.02.05

    The Client applied to Interlegal for analysis of potential consequences of delivering mineral fertilizers of poor quality in the framewo...

    show more
  • UPD: what to do if arrest fails at the first time?2023.11.30

    Fresh news by Interlegal: one of the most interesting latest ship arrests! Let us remind: A Cypriot company filed to Interlegal a req...

    show more
  • Bank request again: additional documents and explanations2023.11.20

    Now in the process of transactions banks often asks our Clients to provide documents certifying lawful payment, mainly agreement between...

    show more
  • Forgive and forget: is small demurrage a reasonable excuse for arbitration proceedings?2023.10.26

    The Seller under CIF Contract applied to Interlegal; it delivered goods to the Buyer within the prescribed supply period and performed a...

    show more
  • Freight management flaws: incorrect notices or disputed claims2023.10.23

    Recently, Interlegal law team defended the Client’s interests in a dispute regarding incorrectly calculated demurrage. The case concerne...

    show more
  • Interlegal obtained FOSFA award in favor of the Client in the amount exceeding 4 million USD2023.10.16

    The Client applied to our law team due to non-performance of contract terms, i.e. non-payment for the goods. Parties to the contract...

    show more