Interlegal consulting upon cancelling the Charter Party
Interlegal consulting upon cancelling the Charter Party
The Charterer applied to Interlegal upon potential actions regarding the Shipowner who failed to perform the Charter Party on voyage from Ukraine to Turkey. As per the Client’s request, the Shipowner failed to deliver the Vessel at loading port within the agreed term; therefore, the Charterer incurred essential losses due to violation of term for goods delivery to the Turkish consignee. The Client intended to cancel the Charter Party, with all the losses to be borne by the Shipowner.
Having analyzed in detail the situation, all the documents and the Charter Party Proforma GENCON 94, Interlegal lawyers stated that the Client was not entitled to cancel the Charter Party earlier than 7 days after the Vessel berthing deadline; otherwise such cancellation should be deemed as premature and the Charterer could be deprived of the right on loss recovery from the Shipowner. So we prevented premature cancelling the Charter Party, helped our Client to reserve its right on loss recovery and provided recommendations upon collecting the evidence in order to confirm such losses.
Interlegal associate attorney Igor Kostov, managed by partner Alexey Remeslo, led the case.
The Buyer failed to fulfill its financial obligations within deadline prescribed by the contract2024.05.23
A client, seller who entered into contracts with two companies of the same group, applied to Interlegal. The contracts provided supply o...
show moreLimassol Boat Show 20242024.05.15
We are pleased to announce that on 23-26 May Interlegal will be participating in the ninth edition of the largest boat show in the Eas...
show moreGeneral average due to collision of vessels. What should the cargo owner do?2024.03.18
Expansion of geography to the Caspian states was and is one of the goals of our company development. Therefore, we are particularly plea...
show moreMisunderstanding and technical errors as the reason for dispute2024.02.12
A company applied to Interlegal for carrying out claims handling with their counterparty. Due to a simple misunderstanding, business rel...
show moreWhat are the legal effects of delivering goods of poor quality under CIF contract?2024.02.05
The Client applied to Interlegal for analysis of potential consequences of delivering mineral fertilizers of poor quality in the framewo...
show moreUPD: what to do if arrest fails at the first time?2023.11.30
Fresh news by Interlegal: one of the most interesting latest ship arrests! Let us remind: A Cypriot company filed to Interlegal a req...
show moreBank request again: additional documents and explanations2023.11.20
Now in the process of transactions banks often asks our Clients to provide documents certifying lawful payment, mainly agreement between...
show moreForgive and forget: is small demurrage a reasonable excuse for arbitration proceedings?2023.10.26
The Seller under CIF Contract applied to Interlegal; it delivered goods to the Buyer within the prescribed supply period and performed a...
show moreFreight management flaws: incorrect notices or disputed claims2023.10.23
Recently, Interlegal law team defended the Client’s interests in a dispute regarding incorrectly calculated demurrage. The case concerne...
show moreInterlegal obtained FOSFA award in favor of the Client in the amount exceeding 4 million USD2023.10.16
The Client applied to our law team due to non-performance of contract terms, i.e. non-payment for the goods. Parties to the contract...
show more