24/7

Interlegal defended the first instance court decision

20 октября 2017 г.: ru 5 en 124 октября 2017 г.: ru 2 en 123 марта 2020 г.: en 2 всего: 68 18.10.17

At the first instance court, Interlegal charged successfully the debt on quay dues exceeding 1,250,000 UAH against the foreign-going vessel. Having disagreed with the court decision, the Defendant – state enterprise applied to the court of appeal on cancelling the court decision.

The debt occurred duet to the vessel stay at the entity’s berth after her transfer to the debtor for operational management. Although the invoice was issued in compliance with the law, it remained unpaid.

Defense of the Client’s interests was complicated by the facts that there was no signed legal service agreement between the parties to dispute, while the primary entity – shipowner was reorganized. Due to the above circumstances, its legal successor – Defendant stated that it was not obliged to pay quay dues and power supply costs. The Defendant contested also the vessel status and the applicable rate of quay dues.

In the process of case consideration, Interlegal lawyers denied the Defendant’s argument, proved once more the foreign-going vessel status, lawfulness of claims set by the Client as berth user and direct liability of the Defendant as legal successor and actual shipowner to pay quay dues and additional costs.

Having agreed with position of the first instance court and Interlegal lawyers, the judicial board retained in force the first instance court decision and confirmed lawfulness of the Client’s claims.

Interlegal senior lawyer Karyna Gorovaya and lawyer Mikhail Selivanov led the case.

  • The Buyer failed to fulfill its financial obligations within deadline prescribed by the contract2024.05.23

    A client, seller who entered into contracts with two companies of the same group, applied to Interlegal. The contracts provided supply o...

    show more
  • Limassol Boat Show 20242024.05.15

    We are pleased to announce that on 23-26 May Interlegal will be participating in the ninth edition of the largest boat show in the Eas...

    show more
  • General average due to collision of vessels. What should the cargo owner do?2024.03.18

    Expansion of geography to the Caspian states was and is one of the goals of our company development. Therefore, we are particularly plea...

    show more
  • Misunderstanding and technical errors as the reason for dispute2024.02.12

    A company applied to Interlegal for carrying out claims handling with their counterparty. Due to a simple misunderstanding, business rel...

    show more
  • What are the legal effects of delivering goods of poor quality under CIF contract?2024.02.05

    The Client applied to Interlegal for analysis of potential consequences of delivering mineral fertilizers of poor quality in the framewo...

    show more
  • UPD: what to do if arrest fails at the first time?2023.11.30

    Fresh news by Interlegal: one of the most interesting latest ship arrests! Let us remind: A Cypriot company filed to Interlegal a req...

    show more
  • Bank request again: additional documents and explanations2023.11.20

    Now in the process of transactions banks often asks our Clients to provide documents certifying lawful payment, mainly agreement between...

    show more
  • Forgive and forget: is small demurrage a reasonable excuse for arbitration proceedings?2023.10.26

    The Seller under CIF Contract applied to Interlegal; it delivered goods to the Buyer within the prescribed supply period and performed a...

    show more
  • Freight management flaws: incorrect notices or disputed claims2023.10.23

    Recently, Interlegal law team defended the Client’s interests in a dispute regarding incorrectly calculated demurrage. The case concerne...

    show more
  • Interlegal obtained FOSFA award in favor of the Client in the amount exceeding 4 million USD2023.10.16

    The Client applied to our law team due to non-performance of contract terms, i.e. non-payment for the goods. Parties to the contract...

    show more