24/7

Interlegal lawyers returned 80,000 USD under the Charter Party

12 сентября 2019 г.: ru 28 en 116 сентября 2019 г.: ru 6 en 323 марта 2021 г.: en 1 всего: 78 12.09.19

The Client and the Shipowner concluded the Charter Party in 2017.

Having received by email the Offer, stating that commencement of cooperation between the Parties requires for advance payment under the Charter Party amounting to 80,000 USD, the Client made advance payment.
Further the Shipowner evade performance of the Charter Party with reference to financial difficulties, problems with customs office, port agents, non-performance of formalities regarding the Vessel, followed by cancelling the Charter Party.

But the Client’s advance payment still remained non-returned, keeping no contact with the Client.

Having analyzed the provided documents, Interlegal lawyers stated the following:
- having concluded the Charter Party and requesting for 80,000 USD, the Shipowner knew that the Vessel cannot be used for performance of the Charter Party;
- the Shipowners committed actions beyond its civil obligations;
- the Shipowners committed actions with elements of criminal offense.

Interlegal lawyers drafted and filled the application on crime commitment, having provided to the pretrial investigation body all the evidence serving as grounds for initiating criminal proceedings.

Due to initiating numerous investigative actions aimed at obtaining evidence on the merits, the Client had advance payment amounting to 80,000 USD returned.

Interlegal associate attorney Ellina Romanova and junior lawyer Nikita Kocherba led the case.

  • The Buyer failed to fulfill its financial obligations within deadline prescribed by the contract2024.05.23

    A client, seller who entered into contracts with two companies of the same group, applied to Interlegal. The contracts provided supply o...

    show more
  • Limassol Boat Show 20242024.05.15

    We are pleased to announce that on 23-26 May Interlegal will be participating in the ninth edition of the largest boat show in the Eas...

    show more
  • General average due to collision of vessels. What should the cargo owner do?2024.03.18

    Expansion of geography to the Caspian states was and is one of the goals of our company development. Therefore, we are particularly plea...

    show more
  • Misunderstanding and technical errors as the reason for dispute2024.02.12

    A company applied to Interlegal for carrying out claims handling with their counterparty. Due to a simple misunderstanding, business rel...

    show more
  • What are the legal effects of delivering goods of poor quality under CIF contract?2024.02.05

    The Client applied to Interlegal for analysis of potential consequences of delivering mineral fertilizers of poor quality in the framewo...

    show more
  • UPD: what to do if arrest fails at the first time?2023.11.30

    Fresh news by Interlegal: one of the most interesting latest ship arrests! Let us remind: A Cypriot company filed to Interlegal a req...

    show more
  • Bank request again: additional documents and explanations2023.11.20

    Now in the process of transactions banks often asks our Clients to provide documents certifying lawful payment, mainly agreement between...

    show more
  • Forgive and forget: is small demurrage a reasonable excuse for arbitration proceedings?2023.10.26

    The Seller under CIF Contract applied to Interlegal; it delivered goods to the Buyer within the prescribed supply period and performed a...

    show more
  • Freight management flaws: incorrect notices or disputed claims2023.10.23

    Recently, Interlegal law team defended the Client’s interests in a dispute regarding incorrectly calculated demurrage. The case concerne...

    show more
  • Interlegal obtained FOSFA award in favor of the Client in the amount exceeding 4 million USD2023.10.16

    The Client applied to our law team due to non-performance of contract terms, i.e. non-payment for the goods. Parties to the contract...

    show more