Interlegal lawyers won GAFTA arbitration case in the amount of 200,000 USD
Interlegal succeeded in GAFTA arbitration settlement of the dispute, due to the Buyer’s failure to pay for wheat flour supplied on CFR terms, Toamasina sea port, Madagascar.
A Client applied to Interlegal, as the Seller under trade contract with the large Indian company. The Seller supplied in several batches the goods in containers. Payment should have been made in two installments: 10% as prepayment upon each batch, 90% as direct debit, i.e. against the documents, by bank transfer.
Payment delay occurred at the stage of the contract performance. Two shipped batches remained unpaid against the documents. However the Seller obtained information that the Beneficiary’s bank has issued cargo documents to the latter without payment.
The Buyer explained that payment delay was caused by problems concerning the cargo ultimate beneficiaries in Madagascar. At the stage of claims handling, Interlegal lawyers managed to recover payment from the Buyer partially. To recover the second installment, the Client had to apply to GAFTA arbitration, since the Buyer just made promises and tried to avoid responsibility for payment, mainly due to the Seller’s alleged violations.
In the framework of GAFTA arbitration, the Buyer filed multiple letters of protests, referring, in particular, to alleged problems upon cargo quality and violations of delivery period.
Interlegal lawyers have duly supported the Seller’s positions and proved that the Client fulfilled all its obligations without any violations. Arbitrators supported in full the Seller’s payment claims.
Interlegal lawyer Valeria Ivanova represented the Client’s interests at GAFTA arbitration.
The Buyer failed to fulfill its financial obligations within deadline prescribed by the contract2024.05.23
A client, seller who entered into contracts with two companies of the same group, applied to Interlegal. The contracts provided supply o...
show moreLimassol Boat Show 20242024.05.15
We are pleased to announce that on 23-26 May Interlegal will be participating in the ninth edition of the largest boat show in the Eas...
show moreGeneral average due to collision of vessels. What should the cargo owner do?2024.03.18
Expansion of geography to the Caspian states was and is one of the goals of our company development. Therefore, we are particularly plea...
show moreMisunderstanding and technical errors as the reason for dispute2024.02.12
A company applied to Interlegal for carrying out claims handling with their counterparty. Due to a simple misunderstanding, business rel...
show moreWhat are the legal effects of delivering goods of poor quality under CIF contract?2024.02.05
The Client applied to Interlegal for analysis of potential consequences of delivering mineral fertilizers of poor quality in the framewo...
show moreUPD: what to do if arrest fails at the first time?2023.11.30
Fresh news by Interlegal: one of the most interesting latest ship arrests! Let us remind: A Cypriot company filed to Interlegal a req...
show moreBank request again: additional documents and explanations2023.11.20
Now in the process of transactions banks often asks our Clients to provide documents certifying lawful payment, mainly agreement between...
show moreForgive and forget: is small demurrage a reasonable excuse for arbitration proceedings?2023.10.26
The Seller under CIF Contract applied to Interlegal; it delivered goods to the Buyer within the prescribed supply period and performed a...
show moreFreight management flaws: incorrect notices or disputed claims2023.10.23
Recently, Interlegal law team defended the Client’s interests in a dispute regarding incorrectly calculated demurrage. The case concerne...
show moreInterlegal obtained FOSFA award in favor of the Client in the amount exceeding 4 million USD2023.10.16
The Client applied to our law team due to non-performance of contract terms, i.e. non-payment for the goods. Parties to the contract...
show more