24/7

Interlegal refunded the groundless setoff under the forwarding Contract on CIF terms

21 июня 2017 г.: ru 3 en 226 июня 2017 г.: ru 5 17 апреля : en 1 всего: 66 21.06.17

Interlegal Сlient, a large foreign trading company, acting as a Buyer, concluded a range of trade contracts on agricultural products sale and purchase with one of the largest European Union traders. The Contracts were concluded on CIF terms, one of the Egyptian ports. Payment was agreed by the Parties mainly on CAD terms.

Under one of the Contracts, treated as a forward Contract, the Buyer conducted advance payment amounting to 4,000,000.00 USD.

Within several months, the Seller were supplying the goods in agreed lots to the ports of destination. In the process of supply, presentation of the shipping documents was delayed to the Buyer’s Bank, causing thereby delays in discharge and vessels’ demurrage. The dispute concerning 600,000.00 USD demurrage payment arose between the Parties.

The Buyer acknowledged the amount partially, while most of the claimed demurrage was rejected. Despite the Seller’s groundless demands and the Buyer’s official rejection, the Seller exercised an alleged rights of set off between the disputed amount of demurrage and advance payment under the forward Contract.

The Client applied to Interlegal to defend the infringed interests.

Interlegal experts analyzed the chronology of contractual supplies under which the disputed demurrage was accrued. In addition, grounds and lawfulness of the set off conducted were assessed. With reference to GAFTA Standard Terms, the English law principles and case law, motivated claims were filed against the Seller under three Contracts, on refunding the set off sums under the forward Contract. Several GAFTA arbitration proceedings were initiated.

Due to active engagement of Interlegal lawyers, the Seller had to join negotiations and agreed to settle the dispute amicably. The Parties signed the Settlement Agreement based on which the Seller paid in full the agreed settlement amount to the Buyer.

Interlegal lawyer Olena Ptashenchuk under general supervision of the partner Natalya Myroshnychenko led the case.

  • The Buyer failed to fulfill its financial obligations within deadline prescribed by the contract2024.05.23

    A client, seller who entered into contracts with two companies of the same group, applied to Interlegal. The contracts provided supply o...

    show more
  • Limassol Boat Show 20242024.05.15

    We are pleased to announce that on 23-26 May Interlegal will be participating in the ninth edition of the largest boat show in the Eas...

    show more
  • General average due to collision of vessels. What should the cargo owner do?2024.03.18

    Expansion of geography to the Caspian states was and is one of the goals of our company development. Therefore, we are particularly plea...

    show more
  • Misunderstanding and technical errors as the reason for dispute2024.02.12

    A company applied to Interlegal for carrying out claims handling with their counterparty. Due to a simple misunderstanding, business rel...

    show more
  • What are the legal effects of delivering goods of poor quality under CIF contract?2024.02.05

    The Client applied to Interlegal for analysis of potential consequences of delivering mineral fertilizers of poor quality in the framewo...

    show more
  • UPD: what to do if arrest fails at the first time?2023.11.30

    Fresh news by Interlegal: one of the most interesting latest ship arrests! Let us remind: A Cypriot company filed to Interlegal a req...

    show more
  • Bank request again: additional documents and explanations2023.11.20

    Now in the process of transactions banks often asks our Clients to provide documents certifying lawful payment, mainly agreement between...

    show more
  • Forgive and forget: is small demurrage a reasonable excuse for arbitration proceedings?2023.10.26

    The Seller under CIF Contract applied to Interlegal; it delivered goods to the Buyer within the prescribed supply period and performed a...

    show more
  • Freight management flaws: incorrect notices or disputed claims2023.10.23

    Recently, Interlegal law team defended the Client’s interests in a dispute regarding incorrectly calculated demurrage. The case concerne...

    show more
  • Interlegal obtained FOSFA award in favor of the Client in the amount exceeding 4 million USD2023.10.16

    The Client applied to our law team due to non-performance of contract terms, i.e. non-payment for the goods. Parties to the contract...

    show more