24/7

International Commercial Arbitration and Maritime Arbitration in Ukraine in 2013

13 апреля 2023 г.: ru 1 19 апреля 2023 г.: ru 1 30 ноября 2023 г.: en 1 всего: 23 07.05.14

International Commercial Arbitration Court and Maritime Arbitration committee at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry issued a report of the activities for 2013. These are independent permanent arbitration institutions (third-party tribunal) which activities are regulated by the Law of Ukraine On International Commercial Arbitration of 24 February, 1994, Rules of the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the UCCI and the Statute on the Maritime Arbitration Commission at the UCCI.

 

The most prominent news of 2013 are: these arbitrations began to use in full an electronic document management system, implemented at the end of 2012 which, in addition to ensuring the registration of incoming and outgoing documents, parties to a dispute, status of arbitral proceedings as of specific date and for particular case and control of the duration of such proceedings, will eventually enable putting into operation electronic version of an arbitral case.

 

During the period from 1 January till 31 December 2013 the ICAC at the UCCI registered 428 cases, which is 122 cases more than in 2012.

 

During the year 2013 the ICAC at the UCCI considered and rendered awards in 297 cases, of which 152 cases (51.18%) were considered by the Arbitral Tribunal composed of three arbitrators and 145 cases (48.82%) – by the Arbitral Tribunal composed of a sole arbitrator.

 

In 2013 the consideration of cases of the ICAC at the UCCI has been conducted with the participation of foreign arbitrators from Austria, Belarus, Czech Republic, Germany, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Norway, Poland, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovakia and Switzerland.

 

The Ukrainian residents were the respondents in 55 cases (12.85% of the total amount of cases) and the claimants in 366 cases (85.51%). 10 disputes between foreign parties were referred to the ICAC at the UCCI as to international arbitration of a neutral state, including: disputes between Cyprus and the Netherlands, Cyprus and Moldova, Seychelles and Germany, Cyprus and Slovakia, Russian Federation and Slovakia, Hong Kong and China (2 cases), Switzerland and Georgia, Switzerland and the Netherlands, British Virgin Islands and Denmark).

 

In the majority of cases, disputes submitted to the ICAC in 2013, as well as in previous years, arose in the course international purchase and sale (delivery) of goods (i.e. almost 88%), and in majority concerned the breach of contractual obligations as to the opportune payment or delivery of goods. To a lesser extent, submitted disputes deal with construction contracts, transportation and carriage of goods, leasing and loan.

 

The duration of cases (from the date of initiation of the arbitral proceedings till rendering of the award) was as follows:

 

from 3 till 4 months - 136 cases;
from 5 till 6 months - 104 cases;
from 7 till 9 months - 39 cases;
from 10 till 12 months - 9 cases;
over 12 months - 9 cases.

 

In 2013 there were 16 cases in the Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, including 13 cases registered during the reporting period and 3 cases left from the year 2012.

 

Claims registered by the MAC in 2013 arise out of relationships concerning the following matters:

 

affreightment - 5 cases;
agency - 4 cases;
repair of vessel - 4 cases.

  • The Buyer failed to fulfill its financial obligations within deadline prescribed by the contract2024.05.23

    A client, seller who entered into contracts with two companies of the same group, applied to Interlegal. The contracts provided supply o...

    show more
  • Limassol Boat Show 20242024.05.15

    We are pleased to announce that on 23-26 May Interlegal will be participating in the ninth edition of the largest boat show in the Eas...

    show more
  • General average due to collision of vessels. What should the cargo owner do?2024.03.18

    Expansion of geography to the Caspian states was and is one of the goals of our company development. Therefore, we are particularly plea...

    show more
  • Misunderstanding and technical errors as the reason for dispute2024.02.12

    A company applied to Interlegal for carrying out claims handling with their counterparty. Due to a simple misunderstanding, business rel...

    show more
  • What are the legal effects of delivering goods of poor quality under CIF contract?2024.02.05

    The Client applied to Interlegal for analysis of potential consequences of delivering mineral fertilizers of poor quality in the framewo...

    show more
  • UPD: what to do if arrest fails at the first time?2023.11.30

    Fresh news by Interlegal: one of the most interesting latest ship arrests! Let us remind: A Cypriot company filed to Interlegal a req...

    show more
  • Bank request again: additional documents and explanations2023.11.20

    Now in the process of transactions banks often asks our Clients to provide documents certifying lawful payment, mainly agreement between...

    show more
  • Forgive and forget: is small demurrage a reasonable excuse for arbitration proceedings?2023.10.26

    The Seller under CIF Contract applied to Interlegal; it delivered goods to the Buyer within the prescribed supply period and performed a...

    show more
  • Freight management flaws: incorrect notices or disputed claims2023.10.23

    Recently, Interlegal law team defended the Client’s interests in a dispute regarding incorrectly calculated demurrage. The case concerne...

    show more
  • Interlegal obtained FOSFA award in favor of the Client in the amount exceeding 4 million USD2023.10.16

    The Client applied to our law team due to non-performance of contract terms, i.e. non-payment for the goods. Parties to the contract...

    show more