Legal advice upon force majeure by Interlegal: Pivdennyi Sea Port
On May 22, 2023, the UNO got concerned of Pivdennyi Sea Port, previously functioning in the framework of Grain Deal. They state, vessel traffic to Pivdennyi Sea Port ceased just on May 02, 2023, due to aggressive actions of the Russian federation and sabotage of the Coordination Center.
The Client applied to Interlegal upon the following issue. Although the Client intended to take the goods at the above seaport, vessel traffic got blocked and therefore the Client was unable to fulfill its contractual obligations due to force majeure.
The contract provided an option to refer to force majeure, in particular, in case of:
- export prohibition
- blockade
- hostilities
As per general rule, the current situation was clearly treated as force majeure. Interlegal provided full and detailed legal advice to the Client, indicating that in such case force majeure in fact was declared in accordance with the contract.
It should be noted that most of situations, whereto the parties refer as force majeure, should have a documentary confirmation, for instance, in the form of Certificate of Force Majeure issued by the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. However, each certain case is a unique one: it depends on the contract and terms & conditions set forth therein.
Interlegal law team – junior lawyers Larysa Karakach & Denys Bakaiev, managed by partner Alexey Remeslo – led the case.
The Buyer failed to fulfill its financial obligations within deadline prescribed by the contract2024.05.23
A client, seller who entered into contracts with two companies of the same group, applied to Interlegal. The contracts provided supply o...
show moreLimassol Boat Show 20242024.05.15
We are pleased to announce that on 23-26 May Interlegal will be participating in the ninth edition of the largest boat show in the Eas...
show moreGeneral average due to collision of vessels. What should the cargo owner do?2024.03.18
Expansion of geography to the Caspian states was and is one of the goals of our company development. Therefore, we are particularly plea...
show moreMisunderstanding and technical errors as the reason for dispute2024.02.12
A company applied to Interlegal for carrying out claims handling with their counterparty. Due to a simple misunderstanding, business rel...
show moreWhat are the legal effects of delivering goods of poor quality under CIF contract?2024.02.05
The Client applied to Interlegal for analysis of potential consequences of delivering mineral fertilizers of poor quality in the framewo...
show moreUPD: what to do if arrest fails at the first time?2023.11.30
Fresh news by Interlegal: one of the most interesting latest ship arrests! Let us remind: A Cypriot company filed to Interlegal a req...
show moreBank request again: additional documents and explanations2023.11.20
Now in the process of transactions banks often asks our Clients to provide documents certifying lawful payment, mainly agreement between...
show moreForgive and forget: is small demurrage a reasonable excuse for arbitration proceedings?2023.10.26
The Seller under CIF Contract applied to Interlegal; it delivered goods to the Buyer within the prescribed supply period and performed a...
show moreFreight management flaws: incorrect notices or disputed claims2023.10.23
Recently, Interlegal law team defended the Client’s interests in a dispute regarding incorrectly calculated demurrage. The case concerne...
show moreInterlegal obtained FOSFA award in favor of the Client in the amount exceeding 4 million USD2023.10.16
The Client applied to our law team due to non-performance of contract terms, i.e. non-payment for the goods. Parties to the contract...
show more