24/7

The Law of Ukraine ‘On Sea Ports’ has been sent back to the Verkhovna Rada

всего: 0 07.12.11

The draft law on ports provides to define that the use of water of the water objects for the needs of sea and river vessels is not referred to some special water use. However, Mr. Yanukovich considers that water use for the navigation cannot be referred to the general use as the general water use covers swimming, boat sailing, fishery etc. Mr. Yanukovich highlights that the law on ports stipulates introduction of a new type of water use (other than the type provided by the Water Code of Ukraine): water use of the water areas of sea ports. However, the law does not define the mechanism for such water use (pay principle for the water use, legal regime for the water use and water conservation, reconstitution of the water resources within the limits of the water basin of sea ports, requirements towards administrations of the sea ports related to the water use etc.). The President also noted the non-compliance of the provisions of the law on ports with the land legislation. For example, the Land Code links the land plot allotment to delimitation of frontiers in kind, while the law on ports links the land plot allotment to coordinates of the limits of the allotted sea port water basin. Mr. Yanukovich observes that the law on the ports does not cover the requirements defined by the basic legal framework. Besides, the law on ports does not provide the mechanisms for implementation of the provisions stipulated herein; accordingly it may cause numerous problems and improper use due to the diverse application of the law. Moreover, the law on ports stipulates that the premises for the check points through the customs border shall be provided by the administration of the port or owner of the sea terminal to the state authorities into the lease that is unacceptable as the state control (ecological, cross border, customs, sanitary and quarantine) on border protection is to be provided free of charge. In addition, the law on ports defines that the port infrastructure objects within the limits of the sea ports are privatized pursuant to the legislation on privatization considering the peculiarities provided by this law (Part I Article 12). At the same time the concept for privatization of such objects is not balanced. The President also noted that the requirement of the law on reorganization of the sea ports within 10 months from the date of the law publication by way of their division, their exclusion from the list of the companies not being subject to privatization may cause some risks related to abuse and loss of the port infrastructure objects providing vital activity of the state in the whole. Thus, Mr. Yanukovich concluded that the law entails some other remarks, including the conceptual ones. Accordingly, it may lead to numerous legal collisions, cause problems in legal regulation of the corresponding relations. Basing upon the abovementioned the President decided to reject the bill. Just to remind you that on the 3rd of November 2011 the Verkhovna Rada adopted the draft law ‘On Sea Ports of Ukraine’ that had been considering for the latest 9 years. It is supposed that the law will simplify the PPP in the ports and shall lead to attraction of the investments into the port sector.

  • The Buyer failed to fulfill its financial obligations within deadline prescribed by the contract2024.05.23

    A client, seller who entered into contracts with two companies of the same group, applied to Interlegal. The contracts provided supply o...

    show more
  • Limassol Boat Show 20242024.05.15

    We are pleased to announce that on 23-26 May Interlegal will be participating in the ninth edition of the largest boat show in the Eas...

    show more
  • General average due to collision of vessels. What should the cargo owner do?2024.03.18

    Expansion of geography to the Caspian states was and is one of the goals of our company development. Therefore, we are particularly plea...

    show more
  • Misunderstanding and technical errors as the reason for dispute2024.02.12

    A company applied to Interlegal for carrying out claims handling with their counterparty. Due to a simple misunderstanding, business rel...

    show more
  • What are the legal effects of delivering goods of poor quality under CIF contract?2024.02.05

    The Client applied to Interlegal for analysis of potential consequences of delivering mineral fertilizers of poor quality in the framewo...

    show more
  • UPD: what to do if arrest fails at the first time?2023.11.30

    Fresh news by Interlegal: one of the most interesting latest ship arrests! Let us remind: A Cypriot company filed to Interlegal a req...

    show more
  • Bank request again: additional documents and explanations2023.11.20

    Now in the process of transactions banks often asks our Clients to provide documents certifying lawful payment, mainly agreement between...

    show more
  • Forgive and forget: is small demurrage a reasonable excuse for arbitration proceedings?2023.10.26

    The Seller under CIF Contract applied to Interlegal; it delivered goods to the Buyer within the prescribed supply period and performed a...

    show more
  • Freight management flaws: incorrect notices or disputed claims2023.10.23

    Recently, Interlegal law team defended the Client’s interests in a dispute regarding incorrectly calculated demurrage. The case concerne...

    show more
  • Interlegal obtained FOSFA award in favor of the Client in the amount exceeding 4 million USD2023.10.16

    The Client applied to our law team due to non-performance of contract terms, i.e. non-payment for the goods. Parties to the contract...

    show more