24/7

Voyage Charter performance: legal support from A to Z

24 апреля 2023 г.: ru 2 en 420 февраля 2023 г.: ru 3 5 июня : en 1 всего: 54 03.02.23

The Client, acting as vessel Voyage Charterer, applied to Interlegal for legal support at the stage of signing the Charter Party on sea transportation from Chornomorsk to one of the Chinese sea ports.

First and foremost, the Client applied for mitigating potential risks of losing control over the goods and bearing extra costs just at the stage of entering into sea carriage contract. At the first stage of legal support, Interlegal lawyers analyzed in detail the draft Charter Party and correspondence between the Parties, carried out due diligence of the counteragent’s status and relation both to the Vessel and the original Shipowner, jointly with granting recommendations upon adjustments in the framework of arranging the draft Charter Party.

The Parties agreed as per Charter Party, inter alia, freight prepayment amounting to 1 million USD by cost remittance to deposit account within 3 days from the moment of signing the Charter Party, which should be released in favor of the Shipowner after issuing Bills of Lading. Due to such circumstance, the Client was eager to cooperate with Interlegal in order to meet requirements both of the Deposit Agreement and the Charter Party itself by the Parties.

At this stage, Interlegal lawyers highlighted all the possible nuances and risks for the Client, developed the detailed plan of further actions, provided legal support in the process of signing and performance of the Deposit Agreement by the Parties, as well as agreed with the Shipowner text of the agreement, all the necessary amendments and additional terms, having settled misunderstanding regarding the moment of prepayment release due to changing some circumstances for the Parties.

Lately, the Vessel sailed on voyage, but the dispute arose between the Parties concerning extra war risk insurance (EWRI) just in the process of transportation.

As per the Charter Party, extra war risk insurance for the first 7 days shall be payable at the Shipowner’s expense, while for the later period it shall be payable at the Charterer’s expense, based on invoice issued by the Shipowner’s P&I Club. The dispute concerned the following: the Charterer desired to pay only H&M insurance war risks, while the Shipowner insisted on additional insurance payments, such as Loss of Hire and Crew Allowances, having significantly increased the claim amount.

At the present stage, Interlegal lawyers provided to the Client necessary legal advice and materials aimed at proper correspondence with the counteragent, with regards to actual case circumstances and English law aspects.

Such negotiations resulted, first of all, in vessel unloading without any additional delays caused by the Shipowner’s intention to detain the cargo, since the Charterer made the recognized payments, while the Shipowner had no right on cargo detention due to unpaid insurance costs. In parallel, the Parties reached a compromise regarding the disputed amount in order to save time and costs for arbitration proceedings.

Interlegal associate attorney Mykola Kozachenko and junior lawyer Diana Mykhailova, by means of their full-scale legal support, facilitated Voyage Charter performance in full and helped the Client to achieve its goal, having mitigated all the possible risks arising during performance.

  • The Buyer failed to fulfill its financial obligations within deadline prescribed by the contract2024.05.23

    A client, seller who entered into contracts with two companies of the same group, applied to Interlegal. The contracts provided supply o...

    show more
  • Limassol Boat Show 20242024.05.15

    We are pleased to announce that on 23-26 May Interlegal will be participating in the ninth edition of the largest boat show in the Eas...

    show more
  • General average due to collision of vessels. What should the cargo owner do?2024.03.18

    Expansion of geography to the Caspian states was and is one of the goals of our company development. Therefore, we are particularly plea...

    show more
  • Misunderstanding and technical errors as the reason for dispute2024.02.12

    A company applied to Interlegal for carrying out claims handling with their counterparty. Due to a simple misunderstanding, business rel...

    show more
  • What are the legal effects of delivering goods of poor quality under CIF contract?2024.02.05

    The Client applied to Interlegal for analysis of potential consequences of delivering mineral fertilizers of poor quality in the framewo...

    show more
  • UPD: what to do if arrest fails at the first time?2023.11.30

    Fresh news by Interlegal: one of the most interesting latest ship arrests! Let us remind: A Cypriot company filed to Interlegal a req...

    show more
  • Bank request again: additional documents and explanations2023.11.20

    Now in the process of transactions banks often asks our Clients to provide documents certifying lawful payment, mainly agreement between...

    show more
  • Forgive and forget: is small demurrage a reasonable excuse for arbitration proceedings?2023.10.26

    The Seller under CIF Contract applied to Interlegal; it delivered goods to the Buyer within the prescribed supply period and performed a...

    show more
  • Freight management flaws: incorrect notices or disputed claims2023.10.23

    Recently, Interlegal law team defended the Client’s interests in a dispute regarding incorrectly calculated demurrage. The case concerne...

    show more
  • Interlegal obtained FOSFA award in favor of the Client in the amount exceeding 4 million USD2023.10.16

    The Client applied to our law team due to non-performance of contract terms, i.e. non-payment for the goods. Parties to the contract...

    show more