24/7

The Appeal Court of Odessa Region has confirmed the first instance court decision upon the dispute between the Client and the Southern Customs Office

25 июля 2020 г.: en 213 апреля 2022 г.: en 228 ноября 2022 г.: en 2 всего: 47 06.10.14

On the 26th of September 2014 the Appeal Court of Odessa Region left unchanged the Odessa Malinovskiy District Court decision upon closing the proceeding on bringing the Forwarder to administrative responsibility due to wrong classification of goods in the process of declaring thereof.

Let us remind the matter stated in the news dd. the 18th of August 2014:

On the 30th of May 2014 the Southern Customs Office of the Ministry of Incomes detained a set of lanterns carried from China to Transnistria via the Odessa Commercial Sea Port.

These goods were declared by the employees of the Ukrainian Transport & Forwarding Company on the grounds of documents submitted by the Client.

There were no violations detected during three inspections but the Southern Customs initiated the merchandising expertise in order to determine the code of goods under the Ukrainian Customs Commodity Classification Codes for Foreign Trade. Having obtained the results of expertise, the Customs considered that the lanterns were electrical shockers. Therefore it made a Protocol on violation of customs rules under Article 472 of the Customs Code of Ukraine, which provides confiscation of goods and fine in the amount of 100% of the cost thereof.

Lawyers from Interlegal managed to prove absence of elements of the violation (subjective aspect) in the declarant’s actions.

According to the Odessa Malinovskiy District Court decision dd. the 7th of August 2014, the case upon bringing the declarant to administrative responsibility was closed and the Southern Customs Office was entitled to return the seized goods.

Therefore the Odessa Region Appeal Court dd. the 26th of September 2014 confirmed illegal actions of the Southern Customs upon causeless detention of goods for more than two months.

Alexey Remeslo, the senior lawyer, and Sergey Sushko, the lawyer, represented the Client’s interests. 

  • The Buyer failed to fulfill its financial obligations within deadline prescribed by the contract2024.05.23

    A client, seller who entered into contracts with two companies of the same group, applied to Interlegal. The contracts provided supply o...

    show more
  • Limassol Boat Show 20242024.05.15

    We are pleased to announce that on 23-26 May Interlegal will be participating in the ninth edition of the largest boat show in the Eas...

    show more
  • General average due to collision of vessels. What should the cargo owner do?2024.03.18

    Expansion of geography to the Caspian states was and is one of the goals of our company development. Therefore, we are particularly plea...

    show more
  • Misunderstanding and technical errors as the reason for dispute2024.02.12

    A company applied to Interlegal for carrying out claims handling with their counterparty. Due to a simple misunderstanding, business rel...

    show more
  • What are the legal effects of delivering goods of poor quality under CIF contract?2024.02.05

    The Client applied to Interlegal for analysis of potential consequences of delivering mineral fertilizers of poor quality in the framewo...

    show more
  • UPD: what to do if arrest fails at the first time?2023.11.30

    Fresh news by Interlegal: one of the most interesting latest ship arrests! Let us remind: A Cypriot company filed to Interlegal a req...

    show more
  • Bank request again: additional documents and explanations2023.11.20

    Now in the process of transactions banks often asks our Clients to provide documents certifying lawful payment, mainly agreement between...

    show more
  • Forgive and forget: is small demurrage a reasonable excuse for arbitration proceedings?2023.10.26

    The Seller under CIF Contract applied to Interlegal; it delivered goods to the Buyer within the prescribed supply period and performed a...

    show more
  • Freight management flaws: incorrect notices or disputed claims2023.10.23

    Recently, Interlegal law team defended the Client’s interests in a dispute regarding incorrectly calculated demurrage. The case concerne...

    show more
  • Interlegal obtained FOSFA award in favor of the Client in the amount exceeding 4 million USD2023.10.16

    The Client applied to our law team due to non-performance of contract terms, i.e. non-payment for the goods. Parties to the contract...

    show more